Tesla P100 SXM2 vs GeForce 9400M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1445not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.55no data
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)Pascal (2016−2021)
GPU code nameC79GP100
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date15 October 2008 (17 years ago)5 April 2016 (10 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores163584
Core clock speed580 MHz1328 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1480 MHz
Number of transistors314 million15,300 million
Manufacturing process technology65 nm16 nm
Power consumption (TDP)12 Watt300 Watt
Texture fill rate4.640331.5
Floating-point processing power0.0448 TFLOPS10.61 TFLOPS
ROPs496
TMUs8224
L1 Cacheno data1.3 MB
L2 Cacheno data4 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedHBM2
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared16 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared4096 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared704 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data720.9 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model4.06.4
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCLN/A1.2
VulkanN/A1.2.131
CUDA-6.0

Pros & cons summary


Recency 15 October 2008 5 April 2016
Chip lithography 65 nm 16 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 12 Watt 300 Watt

GeForce 9400M has 2400% lower power consumption.

Tesla P100 SXM2, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 7 years, and a 306% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 9400M and Tesla P100 SXM2. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce 9400M is a notebook graphics card while Tesla P100 SXM2 is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 54 votes

Rate GeForce 9400M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.9 54 votes

Rate Tesla P100 SXM2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 9400M or Tesla P100 SXM2, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.