GeForce GTX 260 216 vs 9400M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1445not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.55no data
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)
GPU code nameC79GT200
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date15 October 2008 (17 years ago)16 September 2008 (17 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$299

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores16216
Core clock speed580 MHz576 MHz
Number of transistors314 million1,400 million
Manufacturing process technology65 nm65 nm
Power consumption (TDP)12 Watt182 Watt
Texture fill rate4.64041.47
Floating-point processing power0.0448 TFLOPS0.5365 TFLOPS
ROPs428
TMUs872
L2 Cacheno data224 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data2x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR3
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared896 MB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared448 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared999 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data111.9 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs2x DVI, 1x S-Video

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model4.04.0
OpenGL3.33.3
OpenCLN/A1.1
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA-1.3

Pros & cons summary


Power consumption (TDP) 12 Watt 182 Watt

GeForce 9400M has 1417% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 9400M and GeForce GTX 260 Core 216. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce 9400M is a notebook graphics card while GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 54 votes

Rate GeForce 9400M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 26 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 260 Core 216 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 9400M or GeForce GTX 260 Core 216, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.