GeForce 8400 GS PCI vs 9400M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1445not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.55no data
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)
GPU code nameC79GT218
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date15 October 2008 (17 years ago)17 April 2007 (19 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1616
Core clock speed580 MHz520 MHz
Number of transistors314 million260 million
Manufacturing process technology65 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)12 Watt40 Watt
Texture fill rate4.6404.160
Floating-point processing power0.0448 TFLOPS0.03936 TFLOPS
ROPs44
TMUs88
L2 Cacheno data32 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCI
Lengthno data170 mm
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedDDR3
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared512 MB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared64 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared500 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data8 GB/s
Shared memory+no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA
HDMI-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)11.1 (10_1)
Shader Model4.04.1
OpenGL3.33.3
OpenCLN/A1.1
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA-1.2

Pros & cons summary


Recency 15 October 2008 17 April 2007
Chip lithography 65 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 12 Watt 40 Watt

GeForce 9400M has an age advantage of 1 year, and 233% lower power consumption.

8400 GS PCI, on the other hand, has a 63% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 9400M and GeForce 8400 GS PCI. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce 9400M is a notebook graphics card while GeForce 8400 GS PCI is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.8 54 votes

Rate GeForce 9400M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.7 653 votes

Rate GeForce 8400 GS PCI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 9400M or GeForce 8400 GS PCI, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.