UHD Graphics 16EU vs GeForce 9400M (G) / ION (LE)

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1411not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.87no data
Architectureno dataGeneration 12.1 (2020−2021)
GPU code nameMCP79MXRocket Lake GT1
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date14 October 2008 (17 years ago)2021 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores16128
Core clock speed450 MHz300 MHz
Boost clock speedno data900 MHz
Number of transistors282 Millionno data
Manufacturing process technology65 nm14 nm+++
Power consumption (TDP)12 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rateno data7.200
Floating-point processing powerno data0.2304 TFLOPS
ROPsno data8
TMUsno data8

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataRing Bus
Widthno dataIGP

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amountno dataSystem Shared
Memory bus widthno dataSystem Shared
Memory clock speedno dataSystem Shared
Shared memory++

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno dataMotherboard Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.012 (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.6
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data3.0
Vulkan-1.3

Pros & cons summary


Chip lithography 65 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 12 Watt 15 Watt

9400M (G) / ION (LE) has 25% lower power consumption.

UHD Graphics 16EU, on the other hand, has a 364% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 9400M (G) / ION (LE) and UHD Graphics 16EU. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce 9400M (G) / ION (LE) is a notebook graphics card while UHD Graphics 16EU is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.5 38 votes

Rate GeForce 9400M (G) / ION (LE) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.5 24 votes

Rate UHD Graphics 16EU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 9400M (G) / ION (LE) or UHD Graphics 16EU, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.