Radeon Vega Frontier Edition Watercooled vs GeForce 9400M (G) / ION (LE)

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1407not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.87no data
Architectureno dataGCN 5.0 (2017−2020)
GPU code nameMCP79MXVega 10
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date14 October 2008 (17 years ago)13 July 2017 (9 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$1,489

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores164096
Core clock speed450 MHz1382 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1600 MHz
Number of transistors282 Million12,500 million
Manufacturing process technology65 nm14 nm
Power consumption (TDP)12 Watt375 Watt
Texture fill rateno data409.6
Floating-point processing powerno data13.11 TFLOPS
ROPsno data64
TMUsno data256
L1 Cacheno data1 MB
L2 Cacheno data4 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataPCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataHBM2
Maximum RAM amountno data16 GB
Memory bus widthno data2048 Bit
Memory clock speedno data945 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data483.8 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno data1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
HDMI-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10.012 (12_1)
Shader Modelno data6.4
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data2.0
Vulkan-1.1.125

Pros & cons summary


Recency 14 October 2008 13 July 2017
Chip lithography 65 nm 14 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 12 Watt 375 Watt

9400M (G) / ION (LE) has 3025% lower power consumption.

Vega Frontier Edition Watercooled, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 8 years, and a 364% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 9400M (G) / ION (LE) and Radeon Vega Frontier Edition Watercooled. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce 9400M (G) / ION (LE) is a notebook graphics card while Radeon Vega Frontier Edition Watercooled is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.5 38 votes

Rate GeForce 9400M (G) / ION (LE) on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 2 votes

Rate Radeon Vega Frontier Edition Watercooled on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 9400M (G) / ION (LE) or Radeon Vega Frontier Edition Watercooled, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.