FirePro S7150 x2 vs GeForce 9400

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1356not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.70no data
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)GCN 3.0 (2014−2019)
GPU code nameC79Tonga
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date18 June 2008 (18 years ago)1 February 2016 (10 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$3,999

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores161792 ×2
Core clock speed450 MHz920 MHz
Number of transistors314 million5,000 million
Manufacturing process technology65 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)40 Watt265 Watt
Texture fill rate3.600103.0 ×2
Floating-point processing power0.0352 TFLOPS3.297 TFLOPS ×2
ROPs432 ×2
TMUs8112 ×2
L1 Cacheno data448 KB
L2 Cacheno data512 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIPCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data241 mm
WidthIGP2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR5
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared8 GB ×2
Memory bus widthSystem Shared256 Bit ×2
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1250 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data160.0 GB/s ×2
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-VideoNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)12 (12_0)
Shader Model4.06.5
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCLN/A2.1
VulkanN/A1.2.170

Pros & cons summary


Recency 18 June 2008 1 February 2016
Chip lithography 65 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 40 Watt 265 Watt

GeForce 9400 has 563% lower power consumption.

S7150 x2, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 7 years, and a 132% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 9400 and FirePro S7150 x2. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce 9400 is a desktop graphics card while FirePro S7150 x2 is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.6 16 votes

Rate GeForce 9400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 10 votes

Rate FirePro S7150 x2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 9400 or FirePro S7150 x2, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.