Radeon RX 6700 XT vs GeForce 9400 GT

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce 9400 GT and Radeon RX 6700 XT, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

9400 GT
2008, $80
512 MB DDR2, 50 Watt
0.46
RX 6700 XT
2021, $479
12 GB GDDR6, 230 Watt
47.13
+10146%

6700 XT outperforms 9400 GT by a whopping 10146% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking132879
Place by popularitynot in top-10069
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data44.20
Power efficiency0.7215.96
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)RDNA 2.0 (2020−2025)
GPU code nameG96CNavi 22
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date27 August 2008 (18 years ago)3 March 2021 (5 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$79.99 $479

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores162560
Core clock speed550 MHz2321 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2581 MHz
Number of transistors314 million17,200 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)50 Watt230 Watt
Maximum GPU temperature105 °Cno data
Texture fill rate4.400413.0
Floating-point processing power0.0448 TFLOPS13.21 TFLOPS
ROPs464
TMUs8160
Ray Tracing Coresno data40
L0 Cacheno data640 KB
L1 Cacheno data512 KB
L2 Cache32 KB3 MB
L3 Cacheno data96 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCI-E 2.0no data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length168 mm267 mm
Height4.376" (11.1 cm)no data
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR2GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount512 MB12 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed400 MHz2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth12.8 GB/s384.0 GB/s
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsDual Link DVI1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
Multi monitor support+no data
HDMI++
Maximum VGA resolution2048x1536no data
Audio input for HDMIS/PDIFno data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model4.06.5
OpenGL2.14.6
OpenCL1.12.1
VulkanN/A1.2
CUDA+-

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

9400 GT 0.46
RX 6700 XT 47.13
+10146%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

9400 GT 194
Samples: 1427
RX 6700 XT 19716
+10063%
Samples: 14808

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD1−2143
+14200%
1440p0−177
4K-0−145

Cost per frame, $

1080p79.993.35
+95.8%
1440pno data6.22
4Kno data10.64
  • RX 6700 XT has 96% lower cost per frame in 1080p

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Atomic Heart 232 232
Counter-Strike 2 349 349
Cyberpunk 2077 119 119
Resident Evil 4 Remake 257 257

Full HD
Medium

Atomic Heart 169 169
Battlefield 5 140−150 140−150
Counter-Strike 2 347 347
Cyberpunk 2077 99 99
Far Cry 5 178 178
Fortnite 200−210 200−210
Forza Horizon 4 180−190 180−190
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180 170−180
Valorant 270−280 270−280

Full HD
High

Atomic Heart 101 101
Battlefield 5 140−150 140−150
Counter-Strike 2 206 206
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280 270−280
Cyberpunk 2077 90 90
Dota 2 175 175
Far Cry 5 169 169
Fortnite 200−210 200−210
Forza Horizon 4 180−190 180−190
Grand Theft Auto V 161 161
Metro Exodus 119 119
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180 170−180
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 223 223
Valorant 270−280 270−280

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 140−150 140−150
Cyberpunk 2077 85 85
Dota 2 139 139
Far Cry 5 159 159
Forza Horizon 4 180−190 180−190
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180 170−180
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 127 127
Valorant 270−280 270−280

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 200−210 200−210

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 126 126
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 300−350 300−350
Grand Theft Auto V 102 102
Metro Exodus 71 71
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180 170−180
Valorant 300−350 300−350

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 110−120 110−120
Cyberpunk 2077 56 56
Far Cry 5 137 137
Forza Horizon 4 140−150 140−150
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 100−105 100−105

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 130−140 130−140

4K
High

Atomic Heart 40−45 40−45
Counter-Strike 2 32 32
Grand Theft Auto V 102 102
Metro Exodus 43 43
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 74 74
Valorant 280−290 280−290

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 75−80 75−80
Counter-Strike 2 55−60 55−60
Cyberpunk 2077 25 25
Dota 2 106 106
Far Cry 5 71 71
Forza Horizon 4 95−100 95−100
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 75−80 75−80

4K
Epic

Fortnite 65−70 65−70

This is how 9400 GT and RX 6700 XT compete in popular games:

  • RX 6700 XT is 14200% faster in 1080p

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 62 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.46 47.13
Recency 27 August 2008 3 March 2021
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 12 GB
Chip lithography 55 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 50 Watt 230 Watt

9400 GT has 78% lower power consumption.

RX 6700 XT, on the other hand, has a 10146% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 12 years, a 2300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 87% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon RX 6700 XT is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 9400 GT in performance tests.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 536 votes

Rate GeForce 9400 GT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 8719 votes

Rate Radeon RX 6700 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 9400 GT or Radeon RX 6700 XT, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.