GeForce RTX 3070 vs 9400 GT

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce 9400 GT and GeForce RTX 3070, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

9400 GT
2008, $80
512 MB DDR2, 50 Watt
0.46

RTX 3070 outperforms 9400 GT by a whopping 11391% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking132963
Place by popularitynot in top-10021
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data44.28
Power efficiency0.7118.66
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)Ampere (2020−2025)
GPU code nameG96CGA104
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date27 August 2008 (18 years ago)1 September 2020 (6 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$79.99 $499

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores165888
Core clock speed550 MHz1500 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1725 MHz
Number of transistors314 million17,400 million
Manufacturing process technology55 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)50 Watt220 Watt
Maximum GPU temperature105 °Cno data
Texture fill rate4.400317.4
Floating-point processing power0.0448 TFLOPS20.31 TFLOPS
ROPs496
TMUs8184
Tensor Coresno data184
Ray Tracing Coresno data46
L1 Cacheno data5.8 MB
L2 Cache32 KB4 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCI-E 2.0no data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length168 mm242 mm
Height4.376" (11.1 cm)no data
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 12-pin
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR2GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount512 MB8 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed400 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth12.8 GB/s448.0 GB/s
Shared memoryno data-
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsDual Link DVI1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort
Multi monitor support+no data
HDMI++
Maximum VGA resolution2048x1536no data
Audio input for HDMIS/PDIFno data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model4.06.5
OpenGL2.14.6
OpenCL1.12.0
VulkanN/A1.2
CUDA+8.5
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

9400 GT 0.46
RTX 3070 52.86
+11391%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

9400 GT 194
Samples: 1427
RTX 3070 22068
+11275%
Samples: 39512

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD1−2149
+14800%
1440p0−199
4K0−163

Cost per frame, $

1080p79.993.35
+95.8%
1440pno data5.04
4Kno data7.92
  • RTX 3070 has 96% lower cost per frame in 1080p

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Atomic Heart 263 263
Counter-Strike 2 270−280 270−280
Cyberpunk 2077 147 147
Resident Evil 4 Remake 198 198

Full HD
Medium

Atomic Heart 196 196
Battlefield 5 149 149
Counter-Strike 2 330 330
Cyberpunk 2077 139 139
Far Cry 5 154 154
Fortnite 230−240 230−240
Forza Horizon 4 200−210 200−210
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180 170−180
Valorant 300−350 300−350

Full HD
High

Atomic Heart 113 113
Battlefield 5 132 132
Counter-Strike 2 257 257
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280 270−280
Cyberpunk 2077 126 126
Dota 2 133 133
Far Cry 5 148 148
Fortnite 230−240 230−240
Forza Horizon 4 200−210 200−210
Grand Theft Auto V 139 139
Metro Exodus 120 120
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180 170−180
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 230 230
Valorant 300−350 300−350

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 119 119
Cyberpunk 2077 102 102
Dota 2 125 125
Far Cry 5 141 141
Forza Horizon 4 200−210 200−210
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180 170−180
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 121 121
Valorant 237 237

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 230−240 230−240

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 167 167
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 350−400 350−400
Grand Theft Auto V 98 98
Metro Exodus 75 75
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180 170−180
Valorant 350−400 350−400

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 103 103
Cyberpunk 2077 62 62
Far Cry 5 125 125
Forza Horizon 4 160−170 160−170
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 110−120 110−120

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 140−150 140−150

4K
High

Atomic Heart 45−50 45−50
Counter-Strike 2 43 43
Grand Theft Auto V 117 117
Metro Exodus 49 49
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 90 90
Valorant 300−350 300−350

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 70 70
Counter-Strike 2 65−70 65−70
Cyberpunk 2077 30 30
Dota 2 125 125
Far Cry 5 70 70
Forza Horizon 4 110−120 110−120
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 90−95 90−95

4K
Epic

Fortnite 75−80 75−80

This is how 9400 GT and RTX 3070 compete in popular games:

  • RTX 3070 is 14800% faster in 1080p

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 62 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.46 52.86
Recency 27 August 2008 1 September 2020
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 8 GB
Chip lithography 55 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 50 Watt 220 Watt

9400 GT has 77% lower power consumption.

RTX 3070, on the other hand, has a 11391% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 12 years, a 1500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 85% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 3070 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 9400 GT in performance tests.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.1 536 votes

Rate GeForce 9400 GT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 15257 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 3070 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 9400 GT or GeForce RTX 3070, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.