AeroBox GPU vs GeForce 9300 + nForce 730i

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)
GPU code nameC79Kryptos
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date18 June 2008 (18 years ago)13 March 2020 (6 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores16896
Core clock speed450 MHz935 MHz
Boost clock speedno data985 MHz
Number of transistors314 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology65 nm16 nm
Power consumption (TDP)40 Watt100 Watt
Texture fill rate3.60055.16
Floating-point processing power0.0352 TFLOPS1.765 TFLOPS
ROPs416
TMUs856

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIIGP
WidthIGPno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedDDR3
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared8 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared256 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1066 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data68.22 GB/s
Shared memory+no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-VideoNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)12 (11_1)
Shader Model4.05.1
OpenGL3.3N/A
OpenCLN/A1.2
VulkanN/A1.1

Pros & cons summary


Recency 18 June 2008 13 March 2020
Chip lithography 65 nm 16 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 40 Watt 100 Watt

9300 + nForce 730i has 150% lower power consumption.

AeroBox GPU, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 11 years, and a 306% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 9300 + nForce 730i and AeroBox GPU. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce 9300 + nForce 730i is a desktop graphics card while AeroBox GPU is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.6 7 votes

Rate GeForce 9300 nForce 730i on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.3 680 votes

Rate AeroBox GPU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 9300 + nForce 730i or AeroBox GPU, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.