GeForce RTX 4070 vs 920A

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce 920A with GeForce RTX 4070, including specs and performance data.

GeForce 920A
2015
2 GB DDR3, 33 Watt
1.96
RTX 4070
2023, $599
12 GB GDDR6X, 200 Watt
64.18
+3174%

RTX 4070 outperforms 920A by a whopping 3174% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking95934
Place by popularitynot in top-10066
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data61.45
Power efficiency4.6224.97
ArchitectureKepler 2.0 (2013−2015)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameGK208BAD104
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date13 March 2015 (11 years ago)12 April 2023 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$599

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores3845888
Core clock speed954 MHz1920 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2475 MHz
Number of transistors915 million35,800 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)33 Watt200 Watt
Texture fill rate30.53455.4
Floating-point processing power0.7327 TFLOPS29.15 TFLOPS
ROPs864
TMUs32184
Tensor Coresno data184
Ray Tracing Coresno data46
L1 Cache32 KB5.8 MB
L2 Cache128 KB36 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8PCIe 4.0 x16
Lengthno data240 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3GDDR6X
Maximum RAM amount2 GB12 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed1001 MHz1313 MHz
Memory bandwidth16.02 GB/s504.2 GB/s
Shared memoryno data-
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.7
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.23.0
Vulkan1.1.1261.3
CUDA3.58.9
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

GeForce 920A 1.96
RTX 4070 64.18
+3174%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GeForce 920A 821
Samples: 31
RTX 4070 26851
+3171%
Samples: 21102

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD6−7
−97%
198
1440p3−4
−97.1%
104
4K1−263
+6200%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data3.03
1440pno data5.76
4Kno data9.51

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 300−350 300−350
Cyberpunk 2077 216 216
Hogwarts Legacy 188 188
Resident Evil 4 Remake 240 240

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 170−180 170−180
Counter-Strike 2 300−350 300−350
Cyberpunk 2077 174 174
Far Cry 5 249 249
Fortnite 300−350 300−350
Forza Horizon 4 250−260 250−260
Hogwarts Legacy 158 158
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180 170−180
Valorant 350−400 350−400

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 170−180 170−180
Counter-Strike 2 300−350 300−350
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280 270−280
Cyberpunk 2077 143 143
Far Cry 5 234 234
Fortnite 300−350 300−350
Forza Horizon 4 250−260 250−260
Grand Theft Auto V 174 174
Hogwarts Legacy 131 131
Metro Exodus 170 170
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180 170−180
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 351 351
Valorant 350−400 350−400

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 170−180 170−180
Cyberpunk 2077 128 128
Far Cry 5 218 218
Forza Horizon 4 250−260 250−260
Hogwarts Legacy 103 103
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180 170−180
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 171 171
Valorant 350−400 350−400

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 300−350 300−350

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 190−200 190−200
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 500−550 500−550
Grand Theft Auto V 137 137
Metro Exodus 104 104
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180 170−180
Valorant 450−500 450−500

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 160−170 160−170
Cyberpunk 2077 81 81
Far Cry 5 173 173
Forza Horizon 4 220−230 220−230
Hogwarts Legacy 77 77
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 140 140

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 150−160 150−160

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 85−90 85−90
Grand Theft Auto V 146 146
Hogwarts Legacy 54 54
Metro Exodus 65 65
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 117 117
Valorant 300−350 300−350

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 120−130 120−130
Counter-Strike 2 85−90 85−90
Cyberpunk 2077 36 36
Far Cry 5 93 93
Forza Horizon 4 170−180 170−180
Hogwarts Legacy 40 40
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 95−100 95−100

4K
Epic

Fortnite 75−80 75−80

This is how GeForce 920A and RTX 4070 compete in popular games:

  • RTX 4070 is 3200% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 4070 is 3367% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 4070 is 6200% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 62 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.96 64.18
Recency 13 March 2015 12 April 2023
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 12 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 33 Watt 200 Watt

GeForce 920A has 84% lower power consumption.

RTX 4070, on the other hand, has a 3174% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, a 500% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 82% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 4070 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 920A in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce 920A is a notebook graphics card while GeForce RTX 4070 is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 18 votes

Rate GeForce 920A on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 12890 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 4070 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 920A or GeForce RTX 4070, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.