GeForce GTX 460 OEM vs 920A

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce 920A with GeForce GTX 460 OEM, including specs and performance data.

GeForce 920A
2015
2 GB DDR3, 33 Watt
1.97

460 OEM outperforms 920A by a considerable 45% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking953843
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency4.621.47
ArchitectureKepler 2.0 (2013−2015)Fermi (2010−2014)
GPU code nameGK208BGF104
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date13 March 2015 (11 years ago)11 October 2010 (15 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores384336
Core clock speed954 MHz650 MHz
Number of transistors915 million1,950 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)33 Watt150 Watt
Texture fill rate30.5336.40
Floating-point processing power0.7327 TFLOPS0.8736 TFLOPS
ROPs832
TMUs3256
L1 Cache32 KB448 KB
L2 Cache128 KB512 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8PCIe 2.0 x16
Lengthno data210 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data2x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount2 GB1 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1001 MHz850 MHz
Memory bandwidth16.02 GB/s108.8 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs2x DVI, 1x mini-HDMI
HDMI-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 (11_0)
Shader Model5.15.1
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.21.1
Vulkan1.1.126N/A
CUDA3.52.1

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.97 2.86
Recency 13 March 2015 11 October 2010
Maximum RAM amount 2 GB 1 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 33 Watt 150 Watt

GeForce 920A has an age advantage of 4 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 43% more advanced lithography process, and 355% lower power consumption.

GTX 460 OEM, on the other hand, has a 45% higher aggregate performance score.

The GeForce GTX 460 OEM is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 920A in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce 920A is a notebook graphics card while GeForce GTX 460 OEM is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 18 votes

Rate GeForce 920A on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 20 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 460 OEM on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 920A or GeForce GTX 460 OEM, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.