Radeon RX 8050S vs GeForce 9200M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce 9200M and Radeon RX 8050S, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

GeForce 9200M
2008
12 Watt
0.38

8050S outperforms 9200M by a whopping 9221% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1358163
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency2.46no data
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)no data
GPU code nameC79no data
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date15 October 2008 (17 years ago)6 January 2025 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1632
Core clock speed450 MHzno data
Boost clock speedno data2800 MHz
Number of transistors314 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology65 nmno data
Power consumption (TDP)12 Wattno data
Texture fill rate3.600no data
Floating-point processing power0.0384 TFLOPSno data
ROPs4no data
TMUs8no data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem Sharedno data
Maximum RAM amountSystem Sharedno data
Memory bus widthSystem Sharedno data
Memory clock speedSystem Sharedno data
Shared memory++

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsno data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)no data
Shader Model4.0no data
OpenGL3.3no data
OpenCLN/Ano data
VulkanN/A-

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD1−294
+9300%

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Atomic Heart 100−110 100−110
Counter-Strike 2 200−210 200−210
Cyberpunk 2077 80−85 80−85
Resident Evil 4 Remake 95−100 95−100

Full HD
Medium

Atomic Heart 100−110 100−110
Battlefield 5 120−130 120−130
Counter-Strike 2 200−210 200−210
Cyberpunk 2077 80−85 80−85
Far Cry 5 100 100
Fortnite 150−160 150−160
Forza Horizon 4 130−140 130−140
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 140−150 140−150
Valorant 210−220 210−220

Full HD
High

Atomic Heart 100−110 100−110
Battlefield 5 120−130 120−130
Counter-Strike 2 200−210 200−210
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280 270−280
Cyberpunk 2077 80−85 80−85
Far Cry 5 96 96
Fortnite 150−160 150−160
Forza Horizon 4 130−140 130−140
Grand Theft Auto V 118 118
Metro Exodus 85−90 85−90
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 140−150 140−150
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 156 156
Valorant 210−220 210−220

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 120−130 120−130
Cyberpunk 2077 80−85 80−85
Far Cry 5 85 85
Forza Horizon 4 130−140 130−140
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 140−150 140−150
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 92 92

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 150−160 150−160

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 85−90 85−90
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 250−260 250−260
Grand Theft Auto V 70−75 70−75
Metro Exodus 50−55 50−55
Valorant 250−260 250−260

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 90−95 90−95
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45 40−45
Far Cry 5 85−90 85−90
Forza Horizon 4 100−105 100−105
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 65−70 65−70

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 90−95 90−95

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 40−45 40−45
Grand Theft Auto V 75−80 75−80
Metro Exodus 30−35 30−35
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 55−60 55−60
Valorant 210−220 210−220

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 55−60 55−60
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20 18−20
Far Cry 5 45−50 45−50
Forza Horizon 4 65−70 65−70
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 45−50 45−50

4K
Epic

Fortnite 45−50 45−50

This is how GeForce 9200M and RX 8050S compete in popular games:

  • RX 8050S is 9300% faster in 1080p

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 55 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.38 35.42
Recency 15 October 2008 6 January 2025

RX 8050S has a 9221% higher aggregate performance score, and an age advantage of 16 years.

The Radeon RX 8050S is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 9200M in performance tests.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


1.5 2 votes

Rate GeForce 9200M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 1 vote

Rate Radeon RX 8050S on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 9200M or Radeon RX 8050S, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.