GeForce GTX 285 X2 vs 9200M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1375not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency2.19no data
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)
GPU code nameC79GT200B
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date15 October 2008 (17 years ago)17 June 2009 (17 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores16240 ×2
Core clock speed450 MHz648 MHz
Number of transistors314 million1,400 million
Manufacturing process technology65 nm55 nm
Power consumption (TDP)12 Watt315 Watt
Texture fill rate3.60051.84 ×2
Floating-point processing power0.0384 TFLOPS0.7085 TFLOPS ×2
ROPs432 ×2
TMUs880 ×2
L2 Cacheno data256 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Lengthno data275 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data2x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR3
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared2 GB ×2
Memory bus widthSystem Shared512 Bit ×2
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1152 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data147.5 GB/s ×2
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs2x DVI, 1x HDMI
HDMI-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model4.04.0
OpenGL3.33.3
OpenCLN/A1.1
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA-1.3

Pros & cons summary


Recency 15 October 2008 17 June 2009
Chip lithography 65 nm 55 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 12 Watt 315 Watt

GeForce 9200M has 2525% lower power consumption.

GTX 285 X2, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 8 months, and a 18% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 9200M and GeForce GTX 285 X2. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce 9200M is a notebook graphics card while GeForce GTX 285 X2 is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


1.5 2 votes

Rate GeForce 9200M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8 5 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 285 X2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 9200M or GeForce GTX 285 X2, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.