Quadro FX 3400 vs GeForce 9200

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1347not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.77no data
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)Curie (2003−2013)
GPU code nameC78NV45
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date6 May 2008 (18 years ago)28 June 2004 (22 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores16no data
Core clock speed500 MHz350 MHz
Number of transistors210 million222 million
Manufacturing process technology80 nm130 nm
Power consumption (TDP)40 Watt101 Watt
Texture fill rate4.0005.600
Floating-point processing power0.0384 TFLOPSno data
ROPs416
TMUs816

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIPCIe 1.0 x16
WidthIGP1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR3
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared256 MB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared256 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared450 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data28.8 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video2x DVI, 1x S-Video

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)9.0c (9_3)
Shader Model4.03.0
OpenGL3.32.1
OpenCLN/AN/A
VulkanN/AN/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 6 May 2008 28 June 2004
Chip lithography 80 nm 130 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 40 Watt 101 Watt

GeForce 9200 has an age advantage of 3 years, a 63% more advanced lithography process, and 153% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 9200 and Quadro FX 3400. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce 9200 is a desktop graphics card while Quadro FX 3400 is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 26 votes

Rate GeForce 9200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 7 votes

Rate Quadro FX 3400 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 9200 or Quadro FX 3400, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.