GeForce GT 230 OEM vs 9200

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1347not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.77no data
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)Tesla (2006−2010)
GPU code nameC78G92B
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date6 May 2008 (18 years ago)27 April 2009 (17 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1696
Core clock speed500 MHz500 MHz
Number of transistors210 million754 million
Manufacturing process technology80 nm55 nm
Power consumption (TDP)40 Watt75 Watt
Texture fill rate4.00024.00
Floating-point processing power0.0384 TFLOPS0.24 TFLOPS
ROPs412
TMUs848
L2 Cacheno data48 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIPCIe 2.0 x16
WidthIGP1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedDDR2
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared1536 MB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared192 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared500 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data24 GB/s
Shared memory+no data

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-VideoNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model4.04.0
OpenGL3.33.3
OpenCLN/A1.1
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA-1.1

Pros & cons summary


Recency 6 May 2008 27 April 2009
Chip lithography 80 nm 55 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 40 Watt 75 Watt

GeForce 9200 has 88% lower power consumption.

GT 230 OEM, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 11 months, and a 45% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 9200 and GeForce GT 230 OEM. We've got no test results to judge.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 26 votes

Rate GeForce 9200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 9 votes

Rate GeForce GT 230 OEM on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 9200 or GeForce GT 230 OEM, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.