GRID A100B vs GeForce 9200

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1347not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.77no data
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)Ampere (2020−2025)
GPU code nameC78GA100
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date6 May 2008 (18 years ago)14 May 2020 (6 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores166912
Core clock speed500 MHz900 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1005 MHz
Number of transistors210 million54,200 million
Manufacturing process technology80 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)40 Watt400 Watt
Texture fill rate4.000434.2
Floating-point processing power0.0384 TFLOPS13.89 TFLOPS
ROPs4192
TMUs8432
Tensor Coresno data432
L1 Cacheno data20.3 MB
L2 Cacheno data48 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIPCIe 4.0 x16
WidthIGPIGP
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedHBM2e
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared48 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared6144 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1215 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data1,866 GB/s
Shared memory+-
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-VideoNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model4.06.5
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCLN/A2.0
VulkanN/A1.2
CUDA-8.0
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 6 May 2008 14 May 2020
Chip lithography 80 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 40 Watt 400 Watt

GeForce 9200 has 900% lower power consumption.

GRID A100B, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 12 years, and a 1043% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 9200 and GRID A100B. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce 9200 is a desktop graphics card while GRID A100B is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.8 26 votes

Rate GeForce 9200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 4 votes

Rate GRID A100B on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 9200 or GRID A100B, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.