Tegra 4i vs GeForce 9100M G

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1475not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Architectureno dataVLIW Vec4 (2010−2013)
GPU code nameMCP77MH MCP79MHTegra 4
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date3 June 2008 (18 years ago)19 February 2013 (13 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores8no data
Core clock speed450 MHz660 MHz
Number of transistorsno data11 million
Manufacturing process technology65 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)no data20 Watt
Texture fill rateno data1.320
ROPsno data2
TMUsno data2

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Interfaceno dataIGP

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno dataSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amountno dataSystem Shared
Memory bus widthno dataSystem Shared
Memory clock speedno dataSystem Shared
Shared memory++

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno dataNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10N/A
OpenGLno dataES 3.0
OpenCLno dataN/A
Vulkan-N/A

Pros & cons summary


Recency 3 June 2008 19 February 2013
Chip lithography 65 nm 28 nm

Tegra 4i has an age advantage of 4 years, and a 132% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 9100M G and Tegra 4i. We've got no test results to judge.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 22 votes

Rate GeForce 9100M G on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

No user ratings yet.

Rate Tegra 4i on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 9100M G or Tegra 4i, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.