GeForce 7190M vs 9100M G

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1471not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
GPU code nameMCP77MH MCP79MHno data
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date3 June 2008 (18 years ago)1 February 2006 (20 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores83
Core clock speed450 MHz1 MHz
Manufacturing process technology65 nm90 nm

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeno datashared Memory
Shared memory++

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX10shared Memory

Pros & cons summary


Recency 3 June 2008 1 February 2006
Chip lithography 65 nm 90 nm

9100M G has an age advantage of 2 years, and a 38% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 9100M G and GeForce 7190M. We've got no test results to judge.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.5 22 votes

Rate GeForce 9100M G on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2 2 votes

Rate GeForce 7190M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 9100M G or GeForce 7190M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.