RTX 3000 Ada Generation Mobile vs GeForce 9100M G mGPU

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated133
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data26.00
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameC79AD106
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
Release date29 July 2008 (18 years ago)21 March 2023 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores84608
Core clock speed450 MHz1395 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1695 MHz
Number of transistors314 million22,900 million
Manufacturing process technology65 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)12 Watt115 Watt
Texture fill rate3.600244.1
Floating-point processing power0.0176 TFLOPS15.62 TFLOPS
ROPs448
TMUs8144
Tensor Coresno data144
Ray Tracing Coresno data36
L1 Cacheno data4.5 MB
L2 Cacheno data32 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared8 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared128 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared2000 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data256.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model4.06.8
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCLN/A3.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA-8.9
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 29 July 2008 21 March 2023
Chip lithography 65 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 12 Watt 115 Watt

9100M G mGPU has 858% lower power consumption.

RTX 3000 Ada Generation Mobile, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 14 years, and a 1200% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 9100M G mGPU Intel and RTX 3000 Ada Generation Mobile. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce 9100M G mGPU Intel is a notebook graphics card while RTX 3000 Ada Generation Mobile is a mobile workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


No user ratings yet.

Rate GeForce 9100M G mGPU Intel on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 13 votes

Rate RTX 3000 Ada Generation Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 9100M G mGPU Intel or RTX 3000 Ada Generation Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.