FirePro S10000 Passive vs GeForce 8800 Ultra

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1022not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.02no data
Power efficiency0.70no data
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)GCN 1.0 (2012−2020)
GPU code nameG80Tahiti
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date2 May 2007 (19 years ago)12 November 2012 (13 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$829 $3,599

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores6123584 ×2
Core clock speed612 MHz825 MHz
Boost clock speedno data950 MHz
Number of transistors681 million4,313 million
Manufacturing process technology90 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)171 Watt750 Watt
Texture fill rate39.17106.4 ×2
Floating-point processing power0.3871 TFLOPS3.405 TFLOPS ×2
ROPs2432 ×2
TMUs32112 ×2
L1 Cacheno data448 KB
L2 Cache96 KB768 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportno dataPCIe 3.0
InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length270 mm305 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Form factorno datafull height / full length
Supplementary power connectors2x 6-pin2x 8-pin
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount512 MB6 GB ×2
Memory bus width384 Bit384 Bit ×2
Memory clock speed1080 MHz1250 MHz
Memory bandwidth103.7 GB/s480 GB/s ×2

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-Video1x DVI, 1x mini-DisplayPort
Dual-link DVI support-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)12 (11_1)
Shader Model4.05.1
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCL1.11.2
VulkanN/A1.2.131
CUDA+-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 2 May 2007 12 November 2012
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 6 GB
Chip lithography 90 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 171 Watt 750 Watt

8800 Ultra has 339% lower power consumption.

S10000 Passive, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 5 years, a 1100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 221% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 8800 Ultra and FirePro S10000 Passive. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce 8800 Ultra is a desktop graphics card while FirePro S10000 Passive is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 35 votes

Rate GeForce 8800 Ultra on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8 5 votes

Rate FirePro S10000 Passive on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 8800 Ultra or FirePro S10000 Passive, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.