Apple M4 40-core GPU vs GeForce 8800 Ultra

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1022not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.02no data
Power efficiency0.70no data
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)no data
GPU code nameG80no data
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date2 May 2007 (19 years ago)30 October 2024 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$829 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores61240
Core clock speed612 MHzno data
Number of transistors681 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology90 nm3 nm
Power consumption (TDP)171 Watt45 Watt
Texture fill rate39.17no data
Floating-point processing power0.3871 TFLOPSno data
ROPs24no data
TMUs32no data
L2 Cache96 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16no data
Length270 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors2x 6-pinno data
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3LPDDR5x-8533
Maximum RAM amount512 MBno data
Memory bus width384 Bitno data
Memory clock speed1080 MHz8533 MHz
Memory bandwidth103.7 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-Videono data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)no data
Shader Model4.0no data
OpenGL3.3no data
OpenCL1.1no data
VulkanN/A-
CUDA+-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 2 May 2007 30 October 2024
Chip lithography 90 nm 3 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 171 Watt 45 Watt

Apple M4 40-core GPU has an age advantage of 17 years, a 2900% more advanced lithography process, and 280% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 8800 Ultra and M4 40-core GPU. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce 8800 Ultra is a desktop graphics card while Apple M4 40-core GPU is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.2 35 votes

Rate GeForce 8800 Ultra on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.3 107 votes

Rate M4 40-core GPU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 8800 Ultra or M4 40-core GPU, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.