TITAN RTX vs GeForce 8800 GTX

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce 8800 GTX and TITAN RTX, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

8800 GTX
2006, $599
768 MB GDDR3, 155 Watt
1.33
TITAN RTX
2018, $2,499
24 GB GDDR6, 280 Watt
45.27
+3304%

TITAN RTX outperforms 8800 GTX by a whopping 3304% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking107193
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.025.84
Power efficiency0.6612.50
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameG80TU102
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date8 November 2006 (19 years ago)18 December 2018 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$599 $2,499

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

TITAN RTX has 29100% better value for money than 8800 GTX.

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores5754608
Core clock speed576 MHz1350 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1770 MHz
Number of transistors681 million18,600 million
Manufacturing process technology90 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)155 Watt280 Watt
Texture fill rate36.86509.8
Floating-point processing power0.3456 TFLOPS16.31 TFLOPS
ROPs2496
TMUs32288
Tensor Coresno data576
Ray Tracing Coresno data72
L1 Cacheno data4.5 MB
L2 Cache96 KB6 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length270 mm267 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors2x 6-pin2x 8-pin
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount768 MB24 GB
Memory bus width384 Bit384 Bit
Memory clock speed900 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth86.4 GB/s672.0 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-Video1x HDMI, 3x DisplayPort, 1x USB Type-C
HDMI-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)12 Ultimate (12_1)
Shader Model4.06.5
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCL1.1 (1.0)2.0
VulkanN/A1.2.131
CUDA+7.5
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

8800 GTX 1.33
TITAN RTX 45.27
+3304%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

8800 GTX 555
Samples: 575
TITAN RTX 18858
+3298%
Samples: 282

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD4−5
−3925%
161
+3925%
1440p2−3
−5000%
102
+5000%
4K2−3
−3550%
73
+3550%

Cost per frame, $

1080p149.75
−865%
15.52
+865%
1440p299.50
−1122%
24.50
+1122%
4K299.50
−775%
34.23
+775%
  • TITAN RTX has 865% lower cost per frame in 1080p
  • TITAN RTX has 1122% lower cost per frame in 1440p
  • TITAN RTX has 775% lower cost per frame in 4K

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 353
+0%
353
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 79
+0%
79
+0%
Palworld 147
+0%
147
+0%
Resident Evil 4 Remake 202
+0%
202
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 163
+0%
163
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 342
+0%
342
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 79
+0%
79
+0%
Far Cry 5 165
+0%
165
+0%
Fortnite 169
+0%
169
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 187
+0%
187
+0%
Palworld 124
+0%
124
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 202
+0%
202
+0%
Valorant 348
+0%
348
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 164
+0%
164
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 270
+0%
270
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 79
+0%
79
+0%
Dota 2 155
+0%
155
+0%
Far Cry 5 156
+0%
156
+0%
Fortnite 176
+0%
176
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 186
+0%
186
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 152
+0%
152
+0%
Metro Exodus 134
+0%
134
+0%
Palworld 99
+0%
99
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 163
+0%
163
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 267
+0%
267
+0%
Valorant 336
+0%
336
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 160
+0%
160
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 78
+0%
78
+0%
Dota 2 148
+0%
148
+0%
Far Cry 5 146
+0%
146
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 175
+0%
175
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 136
+0%
136
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 139
+0%
139
+0%
Valorant 236
+0%
236
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 134
+0%
134
+0%
Palworld 91
+0%
91
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 157
+0%
157
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 114
+0%
114
+0%
Metro Exodus 85
+0%
85
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Valorant 307
+0%
307
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 66
+0%
66
+0%
Far Cry 5 134
+0%
134
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 157
+0%
157
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Palworld 66
+0%
66
+0%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 45
+0%
45
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 134
+0%
134
+0%
Metro Exodus 55
+0%
55
+0%
Palworld 71
+0%
71
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 103
+0%
103
+0%
Valorant 300
+0%
300
+0%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 97
+0%
97
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 33
+0%
33
+0%
Dota 2 146
+0%
146
+0%
Far Cry 5 80
+0%
80
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 114
+0%
114
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 96
+0%
96
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 74
+0%
74
+0%
Palworld 36
+0%
36
+0%

This is how 8800 GTX and TITAN RTX compete in popular games:

  • TITAN RTX is 3925% faster in 1080p
  • TITAN RTX is 5000% faster in 1440p
  • TITAN RTX is 3550% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 65 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.33 45.27
Recency 8 November 2006 18 December 2018
Maximum RAM amount 768 MB 24 GB
Chip lithography 90 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 155 Watt 280 Watt

8800 GTX has 81% lower power consumption.

TITAN RTX, on the other hand, has a 3304% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 12 years, a 3100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 650% more advanced lithography process.

The TITAN RTX is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 8800 GTX in performance tests.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 153 votes

Rate GeForce 8800 GTX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.6 880 votes

Rate TITAN RTX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 8800 GTX or TITAN RTX, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.