FirePro M8900 vs GeForce 8800 GTX

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1080not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.02no data
Power efficiency0.66no data
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)TeraScale 2 (2009−2015)
GPU code nameG80Blackcomb
Market segmentDesktopMobile workstation
Release date8 November 2006 (20 years ago)12 April 2011 (15 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$599 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores575960
Core clock speed576 MHz680 MHz
Number of transistors681 million1,700 million
Manufacturing process technology90 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)155 Watt75 Watt
Texture fill rate36.8632.64
Floating-point processing power0.3456 TFLOPS1.306 TFLOPS
ROPs2432
TMUs3248
L1 Cacheno data192 KB
L2 Cache96 KB512 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
Bus supportno datan/a
InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16MXM-B (3.0)
Length270 mmno data
Width2-slotno data
Form factorno dataMXM-B
Supplementary power connectors2x 6-pinNone
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount768 MB2 GB
Memory bus width384 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed900 MHz900 MHz
Memory bandwidth86.4 GB/s115 GB/s
Shared memory--

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-VideoNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)11.2 (11_0)
Shader Model4.05.0
OpenGL3.34.4
OpenCL1.1 (1.0)1.2
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA+-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 8 November 2006 12 April 2011
Maximum RAM amount 768 MB 2 GB
Chip lithography 90 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 155 Watt 75 Watt

FirePro M8900 has an age advantage of 4 years, a 167% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 56% more advanced lithography process, and 52% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 8800 GTX and FirePro M8900. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce 8800 GTX is a desktop graphics card while FirePro M8900 is a mobile workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 153 votes

Rate GeForce 8800 GTX on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 10 votes

Rate FirePro M8900 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 8800 GTX or FirePro M8900, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.