RTX A1000 Embedded vs GeForce 8700M GT SLI

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce 8700M GT SLI with RTX A1000 Embedded, including specs and performance data.

8700M GT SLI
2007
1 GB GDDR3, 58 Watt
0.74
RTX A1000 Embedded
2022
4 GB GDDR6, 35 Watt
23.29
+3047%

RTX A1000 Embedded outperforms 8700M SLI by a whopping 3047% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1235268
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.9951.48
ArchitectureG8x (2007)Ampere (2020−2025)
GPU code nameNB8E-SEGA107S
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
Release date18 September 2007 (18 years ago)30 March 2022 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores642048
Core clock speed625 MHz630 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1140 MHz
Number of transistors578 Millionno data
Manufacturing process technology80 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)58 Watt35 Watt
Texture fill rateno data72.96
Floating-point processing powerno data4.669 TFLOPS
ROPsno data32
TMUsno data64
Tensor Coresno data64
Ray Tracing Coresno data16
L1 Cacheno data2 MB
L2 Cacheno data2 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizelargeno data
Interfaceno dataPCIe 4.0 x8
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount1 GB4 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed800 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data224.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectorsno dataPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX1012 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Modelno data6.7
OpenGLno data4.6
OpenCLno data3.0
Vulkan-1.3
CUDA-8.6
DLSS-+

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−2900%
30−33
+2900%
Palworld 4−5
−2900%
120−130
+2900%

Full HD
Medium

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−2900%
30−33
+2900%
Far Cry 5 0−1 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
−2900%
150−160
+2900%
Palworld 4−5
−2900%
120−130
+2900%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
−3025%
250−260
+3025%
Valorant 27−30
−3003%
900−950
+3003%

Full HD
High

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 21−24
−2995%
650−700
+2995%
Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−2900%
30−33
+2900%
Dota 2 12−14
−2977%
400−450
+2977%
Far Cry 5 0−1 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
−2900%
150−160
+2900%
Metro Exodus 0−1 0−1
Palworld 4−5
−2900%
120−130
+2900%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
−3025%
250−260
+3025%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
−2900%
180−190
+2900%
Valorant 27−30
−3003%
900−950
+3003%

Full HD
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 1−2
−2900%
30−33
+2900%
Dota 2 12−14
−2977%
400−450
+2977%
Far Cry 5 0−1 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 5−6
−2900%
150−160
+2900%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
−3025%
250−260
+3025%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 6−7
−2900%
180−190
+2900%
Valorant 27−30
−3003%
900−950
+3003%

Full HD
Epic

Palworld 4−5
−2900%
120−130
+2900%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 3−4
−2900%
90−95
+2900%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 4−5
−2900%
120−130
+2900%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 8−9
−3025%
250−260
+3025%

1440p
Ultra

Forza Horizon 4 2−3
−2900%
60−65
+2900%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
−2900%
30−33
+2900%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 1−2
−2900%
30−33
+2900%
Palworld 1−2
−2900%
30−33
+2900%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−2900%
450−500
+2900%
Valorant 6−7
−2900%
180−190
+2900%

4K
Ultra

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 2−3
−2900%
60−65
+2900%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 2−3
−2900%
60−65
+2900%

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.74 23.29
Recency 18 September 2007 30 March 2022
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 4 GB
Chip lithography 80 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 58 Watt 35 Watt

RTX A1000 Embedded has a 3047% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 14 years, a 300% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 900% more advanced lithography process, and 66% lower power consumption.

The RTX A1000 Embedded is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 8700M GT SLI in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce 8700M GT SLI is a notebook graphics card while RTX A1000 Embedded is a mobile workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2 4 votes

Rate GeForce 8700M GT SLI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1.9 27 votes

Rate RTX A1000 Embedded on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 8700M GT SLI or RTX A1000 Embedded, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.