Arc Pro A50 vs GeForce 8600M GT

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1350not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.51no data
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)Xe-HPG (2022−2024)
GPU code nameG84DG2-128
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date31 December 2007 (18 years ago)8 August 2022 (4 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores321024
Core clock speed475 MHz2000 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2350 MHz
Number of transistors289 million7,200 million
Manufacturing process technology80 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)20 Watt75 Watt
Texture fill rate7.600150.4
Floating-point processing power0.0608 TFLOPSno data
ROPs832
TMUs1664
Ray Tracing Coresno data8
L2 Cache32 KB4 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizemedium sizedno data
InterfaceMXM-IIPCIe 4.0 x8
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR2GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount512 MB6 GB
Memory bus width128 Bit96 Bit
Memory clock speed400 MHz2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth12.8 GB/s192.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs4x mini-DisplayPort 2.0

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model4.06.6
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCL1.13.0
VulkanN/A1.4
CUDA1.1-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 31 December 2007 8 August 2022
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 6 GB
Chip lithography 80 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 20 Watt 75 Watt

8600M GT has 275% lower power consumption.

Arc Pro A50, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 14 years, a 1100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 1233% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 8600M GT and Arc Pro A50. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce 8600M GT is a notebook graphics card while Arc Pro A50 is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.7 43 votes

Rate GeForce 8600M GT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.8 6 votes

Rate Arc Pro A50 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 8600M GT or Arc Pro A50, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.