GeForce RTX 4080 vs 8600 GTS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce 8600 GTS and GeForce RTX 4080, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

8600 GTS
2007, $199
256 MB GDDR3, 60 Watt
0.44
RTX 4080
2022, $1,199
16 GB GDDR6X, 320 Watt
82.64
+18682%

RTX 4080 outperforms 8600 GTS by a whopping 18682% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking13305
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.0137.85
Power efficiency0.5719.98
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameG84AD103
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date17 April 2007 (19 years ago)20 September 2022 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$199 $1,199

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

RTX 4080 has 378400% better value for money than 8600 GTS.

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores329728
Core clock speed675 MHz2205 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2505 MHz
Number of transistors289 million45,900 million
Manufacturing process technology80 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)60 Watt320 Watt
Texture fill rate10.80761.5
Floating-point processing power0.0928 TFLOPS48.74 TFLOPS
ROPs8112
TMUs16304
Tensor Coresno data304
Ray Tracing Coresno data76
L1 Cacheno data9.5 MB
L2 Cache32 KB64 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length198 mm310 mm
Width1-slot3-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin1x 16-pin
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR6X
Maximum RAM amount256 MB16 GB
Standard memory config per GPU256 MBno data
Memory bus width128 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed1000 MHz1400 MHz
Memory bandwidth32 GB/s716.8 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-Video1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model4.06.7
OpenGL2.14.6
OpenCL1.13.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA1.18.9
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

8600 GTS 0.44
RTX 4080 82.64
+18682%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

8600 GTS 185
Samples: 654
RTX 4080 34429
+18510%
Samples: 11179

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD1−2
−22200%
223
+22200%
1440p0−1154
4K0−1101

Cost per frame, $

1080p199.00
−3601%
5.38
+3601%
1440pno data7.79
4Kno data11.87
  • RTX 4080 has 3601% lower cost per frame in 1080p

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 231
+0%
231
+0%
Palworld 220−230
+0%
220−230
+0%
Resident Evil 4 Remake 291
+0%
291
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 320
+0%
320
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 231
+0%
231
+0%
Far Cry 5 223
+0%
223
+0%
Fortnite 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%
Palworld 237
+0%
237
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Valorant 550−600
+0%
550−600
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 317
+0%
317
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 210
+0%
210
+0%
Dota 2 249
+0%
249
+0%
Far Cry 5 218
+0%
218
+0%
Fortnite 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 178
+0%
178
+0%
Metro Exodus 213
+0%
213
+0%
Palworld 219
+0%
219
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 545
+0%
545
+0%
Valorant 550−600
+0%
550−600
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 190
+0%
190
+0%
Dota 2 233
+0%
233
+0%
Far Cry 5 204
+0%
204
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 258
+0%
258
+0%
Valorant 575
+0%
575
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%
Palworld 218
+0%
218
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 259
+0%
259
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 500−550
+0%
500−550
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 162
+0%
162
+0%
Metro Exodus 154
+0%
154
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Valorant 450−500
+0%
450−500
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 129
+0%
129
+0%
Far Cry 5 201
+0%
201
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 191
+0%
191
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
Palworld 178
+0%
178
+0%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 107
+0%
107
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 185
+0%
185
+0%
Metro Exodus 104
+0%
104
+0%
Palworld 140
+0%
140
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 187
+0%
187
+0%
Valorant 300−350
+0%
300−350
+0%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 63
+0%
63
+0%
Dota 2 227
+0%
227
+0%
Far Cry 5 140
+0%
140
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 290−300
+0%
290−300
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%
Palworld 102
+0%
102
+0%

This is how 8600 GTS and RTX 4080 compete in popular games:

  • RTX 4080 is 22200% faster in 1080p

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 65 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.44 82.64
Recency 17 April 2007 20 September 2022
Maximum RAM amount 256 MB 16 GB
Chip lithography 80 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 60 Watt 320 Watt

8600 GTS has 433% lower power consumption.

RTX 4080, on the other hand, has a 18682% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 15 years, a 6300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 1500% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 4080 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 8600 GTS in performance tests.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.3 227 votes

Rate GeForce 8600 GTS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.1 5590 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 4080 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 8600 GTS or GeForce RTX 4080, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.