GeForce RTX 4070 vs 8500 GT

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce 8500 GT and GeForce RTX 4070, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

8500 GT
2007, $129
256 MB GDDR3, 30 Watt
0.41
RTX 4070
2023, $599
12 GB GDDR6X, 200 Watt
64.32
+15588%

RTX 4070 outperforms 8500 GT by a whopping 15588% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking134433
Place by popularitynot in top-10061
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.0161.84
Power efficiency1.0624.98
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameG86AD104
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date17 April 2007 (19 years ago)12 April 2023 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$129 $599

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

RTX 4070 has 618300% better value for money than 8500 GT.

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores165888
Core clock speed459 MHz1920 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2475 MHz
Number of transistors210 million35,800 million
Manufacturing process technology80 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)30 Watt200 Watt
Texture fill rate3.672455.4
Floating-point processing power0.02938 TFLOPS29.15 TFLOPS
ROPs464
TMUs8184
Tensor Coresno data184
Ray Tracing Coresno data46
L1 Cacheno data5.8 MB
L2 Cache32 KB36 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length229 mm240 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 16-pin
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR6X
Maximum RAM amount256 MB12 GB
Standard memory config per GPU256 MBno data
Memory bus width128 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed400 MHz1313 MHz
Memory bandwidth12.8 GB/s504.2 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model4.06.7
OpenGL2.14.6
OpenCL1.13.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA1.18.9
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

8500 GT 0.41
RTX 4070 64.32
+15588%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

8500 GT 172
Samples: 1149
RTX 4070 26854
+15513%
Samples: 20798

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD1−2198
+19700%
1440p0−1104
4K-0−163

Cost per frame, $

1080p129.003.03
+97.7%
1440pno data5.76
4Kno data9.51
  • RTX 4070 has 98% lower cost per frame in 1080p

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Atomic Heart 320 320
Counter-Strike 2 300−350 300−350
Cyberpunk 2077 216 216
Resident Evil 4 Remake 240 240

Full HD
Medium

Atomic Heart 250 250
Battlefield 5 170−180 170−180
Counter-Strike 2 300−350 300−350
Cyberpunk 2077 174 174
Far Cry 5 249 249
Fortnite 300−350 300−350
Forza Horizon 4 250−260 250−260
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180 170−180
Valorant 350−400 350−400

Full HD
High

Atomic Heart 148 148
Battlefield 5 170−180 170−180
Counter-Strike 2 300−350 300−350
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280 270−280
Cyberpunk 2077 143 143
Far Cry 5 234 234
Fortnite 300−350 300−350
Forza Horizon 4 250−260 250−260
Grand Theft Auto V 174 174
Metro Exodus 170 170
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180 170−180
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 351 351
Valorant 350−400 350−400

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 170−180 170−180
Cyberpunk 2077 128 128
Far Cry 5 218 218
Forza Horizon 4 250−260 250−260
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180 170−180
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 171 171
Valorant 350−400 350−400

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 300−350 300−350

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 190−200 190−200
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 500−550 500−550
Grand Theft Auto V 137 137
Metro Exodus 104 104
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180 170−180
Valorant 450−500 450−500

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 160−170 160−170
Cyberpunk 2077 81 81
Far Cry 5 173 173
Forza Horizon 4 220−230 220−230
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 140 140

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 150−160 150−160

4K
High

Atomic Heart 60−65 60−65
Counter-Strike 2 85−90 85−90
Grand Theft Auto V 146 146
Metro Exodus 65 65
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 117 117
Valorant 300−350 300−350

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 120−130 120−130
Counter-Strike 2 85−90 85−90
Cyberpunk 2077 36 36
Far Cry 5 93 93
Forza Horizon 4 170−180 170−180
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 95−100 95−100

4K
Epic

Fortnite 75−80 75−80

This is how 8500 GT and RTX 4070 compete in popular games:

  • RTX 4070 is 19700% faster in 1080p

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 59 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.41 64.32
Recency 17 April 2007 12 April 2023
Maximum RAM amount 256 MB 12 GB
Chip lithography 80 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 30 Watt 200 Watt

8500 GT has 85% lower power consumption.

RTX 4070, on the other hand, has a 15588% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 15 years, a 4700% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 94% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 4070 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 8500 GT in performance tests.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 373 votes

Rate GeForce 8500 GT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 12873 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 4070 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 8500 GT or GeForce RTX 4070, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.