Arc Pro A60M vs GeForce 8500 GT

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1337not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.01no data
Power efficiency1.06no data
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)Generation 12.7 (2022−2023)
GPU code nameG86DG2-256
Market segmentDesktopMobile workstation
Release date17 April 2007 (19 years ago)6 June 2023 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$129 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores162048
Core clock speed459 MHz900 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1300 MHz
Number of transistors210 million11,500 million
Manufacturing process technology80 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)30 Watt95 Watt
Texture fill rate3.672166.4
Floating-point processing power0.02938 TFLOPS5.325 TFLOPS
ROPs464
TMUs8128
Tensor Coresno data256
Ray Tracing Coresno data16
L2 Cache32 KB8 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length229 mmno data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount256 MB8 GB
Standard memory config per GPU256 MBno data
Memory bus width128 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed400 MHz2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth12.8 GB/s256.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-VideoPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model4.06.6
OpenGL2.14.6
OpenCL1.13.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA1.1-
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 17 April 2007 6 June 2023
Maximum RAM amount 256 MB 8 GB
Chip lithography 80 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 30 Watt 95 Watt

8500 GT has 217% lower power consumption.

Arc Pro A60M, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 16 years, a 3100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 1233% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 8500 GT and Arc Pro A60M. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce 8500 GT is a desktop graphics card while Arc Pro A60M is a mobile workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 373 votes

Rate GeForce 8500 GT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 23 votes

Rate Arc Pro A60M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 8500 GT or Arc Pro A60M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.