Apple M4 Max 40-Core GPU vs GeForce 8400M GT

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1451not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.33no data
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)no data
GPU code nameG86no data
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date9 May 2007 (19 years ago)30 October 2024 (1 year ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores1640
Core clock speed450 MHzno data
Number of transistors210 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology80 nm3 nm
Power consumption (TDP)14 Watt45 Watt
Texture fill rate3.600no data
Floating-point processing power0.0288 TFLOPSno data
ROPs4no data
TMUs8no data
L2 Cache32 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3LPDDR5x-8533
Maximum RAM amount512 MBno data
Memory bus width128 Bitno data
Memory clock speed600 MHz8533 MHz
Memory bandwidth19.2 GB/sno data
Shared memory-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsno data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)no data
Shader Model4.0no data
OpenGL3.3no data
OpenCL1.1no data
VulkanN/A-
CUDA1.1-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 9 May 2007 30 October 2024
Chip lithography 80 nm 3 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 14 Watt 45 Watt

8400M GT has 221% lower power consumption.

Apple M4 Max 40-Core GPU, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 17 years, and a 2567% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 8400M GT and M4 Max 40-Core GPU. We've got no test results to judge.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.5 22 votes

Rate GeForce 8400M GT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.1 42 votes

Rate M4 Max 40-Core GPU on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 8400M GT or M4 Max 40-Core GPU, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.