RTX A3000 Mobile vs GeForce 8400M G

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce 8400M G with RTX A3000 Mobile, including specs and performance data.

8400M G
2007
256 MB GDDR3, 10 Watt
0.25
RTX A3000 Mobile
2021
6 GB GDDR6, 70 Watt
30.14
+11956%

RTX A3000 Mobile outperforms 8400M G by a whopping 11956% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1442213
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.9333.31
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)Ampere (2020−2025)
GPU code nameG86GA104
Market segmentLaptopMobile workstation
Release date9 May 2007 (19 years ago)12 April 2021 (5 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores84096
Core clock speed400 MHz600 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1230 MHz
Number of transistors210 million17,400 million
Manufacturing process technology80 nm8 nm
Power consumption (TDP)10 Watt70 Watt
Texture fill rate3.200157.4
Floating-point processing power0.0128 TFLOPS10.08 TFLOPS
ROPs464
TMUs8128
Tensor Coresno data128
Ray Tracing Coresno data32
L1 Cacheno data4 MB
L2 Cache16 KB4 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount256 MB6 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit192 Bit
Memory clock speed400 MHz1375 MHz
Memory bandwidth6.4 GB/s264.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model4.06.8
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCL1.13.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA1.18.6
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

8400M G 0.25
RTX A3000 Mobile 30.14
+11956%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

8400M G 105
Samples: 97
RTX A3000 Mobile 12556
+11858%
Samples: 1306

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD0−1101
1440p-0−150
4K-0−145

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 77

Full HD
Medium

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 66
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−3867%
110−120
+3867%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−1657%
120−130
+1657%
Valorant 24−27
−672%
190−200
+672%

Full HD
High

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 12−14
−2015%
270−280
+2015%
Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 53
Dota 2 9−10
−1478%
142
+1478%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−3867%
110−120
+3867%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−1657%
120−130
+1657%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−2920%
151
+2920%
Valorant 24−27
−672%
190−200
+672%

Full HD
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 43
Dota 2 9−10
−1367%
132
+1367%
Forza Horizon 4 3−4
−3867%
110−120
+3867%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8
−1657%
120−130
+1657%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6
−1120%
61
+1120%
Valorant 24−27
−672%
190−200
+672%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 2−3
−3450%
70−75
+3450%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 3−4
−5733%
170−180
+5733%

1440p
Ultra

Escape from Tarkov 1−2
−7100%
70−75
+7100%
Forza Horizon 4 0−1 80−85
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2
−5200%
50−55
+5200%

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16
−227%
49
+227%
Valorant 5−6
−3520%
180−190
+3520%

4K
Ultra

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 1−2
−3500%
35−40
+3500%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 2−3
−1700%
35−40
+1700%

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Resident Evil 4 Remake 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Far Cry 5 111
+0%
111
+0%
Fortnite 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Far Cry 5 103
+0%
103
+0%
Fortnite 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 124
+0%
124
+0%
Metro Exodus 70−75
+0%
70−75
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Far Cry 5 93
+0%
93
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 210−220
+0%
210−220
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 62
+0%
62
+0%
Metro Exodus 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Valorant 220−230
+0%
220−230
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 27
+0%
27
+0%
Far Cry 5 69
+0%
69
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 75−80
+0%
75−80
+0%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Metro Exodus 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 45
+0%
45
+0%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 30−35
+0%
30−35
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 14−16
+0%
14−16
+0%
Dota 2 77
+0%
77
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Far Cry 5 36
+0%
36
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 55−60
+0%
55−60
+0%

Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:

  • in Escape from Tarkov, with 1440p resolution and the Ultra Preset, the RTX A3000 Mobile is 7100% faster.

All in all, in popular games:

  • RTX A3000 Mobile performs better in 22 tests (38%)
  • there's a draw in 36 tests (62%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.25 30.14
Recency 9 May 2007 12 April 2021
Maximum RAM amount 256 MB 6 GB
Chip lithography 80 nm 8 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 10 Watt 70 Watt

8400M G has 600% lower power consumption.

RTX A3000 Mobile, on the other hand, has a 11956% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 13 years, a 2300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 900% more advanced lithography process.

The RTX A3000 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 8400M G in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce 8400M G is a notebook graphics card while RTX A3000 Mobile is a mobile workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 22 votes

Rate GeForce 8400M G on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.8 204 votes

Rate RTX A3000 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 8400M G or RTX A3000 Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.