Radeon RX 7800 XT vs GeForce 8400 GS

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce 8400 GS and Radeon RX 7800 XT, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

8400 GS
2007, $30
256 MB DDR2, 40 Watt
0.41
RX 7800 XT
2023, $499
16 GB GDDR6, 263 Watt
58.48
+14163%

7800 XT outperforms 8400 GS by a whopping 14163% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking134747
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data70.08
Power efficiency0.8017.32
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026)
GPU code nameG86Navi 32
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date17 April 2007 (19 years ago)25 August 2023 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$29.99 $499

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores163840
Core clock speed459 MHz1295 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2430 MHz
Number of transistors210 million28,100 million
Manufacturing process technology80 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)40 Watt263 Watt
Texture fill rate3.672583.2
Floating-point processing power0.02938 TFLOPS37.32 TFLOPS
ROPs496
TMUs8240
Ray Tracing Coresno data60
L0 Cacheno data960 KB
L1 Cacheno data768 KB
L2 Cache16 KB4 MB
L3 Cacheno data64 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length170 mm267 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone2x 8-pin
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR2GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount256 MB16 GB
Standard memory config per GPU256 MBno data
Memory bus width64 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed400 MHz2438 MHz
Memory bandwidth6.4 GB/s624.1 GB/s
Shared memoryno data-
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video1x HDMI 2.1a, 3x DisplayPort 2.1
HDMI-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model4.06.7
OpenGL2.14.6
OpenCL1.12.2
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA1.1-

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

8400 GS 0.41
RX 7800 XT 58.48
+14163%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

8400 GS 170
Samples: 3164
RX 7800 XT 24467
+14292%
Samples: 11369

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD1−2214
+21300%
1440p0−1123
4K0−172

Cost per frame, $

1080p29.992.33
+92.2%
1440pno data4.06
4Kno data6.93
  • RX 7800 XT has 92% lower cost per frame in 1080p

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Atomic Heart 324 324
Counter-Strike 2 351 351
Cyberpunk 2077 248 248
Resident Evil 4 Remake 272 272

Full HD
Medium

Atomic Heart 243 243
Battlefield 5 160−170 160−170
Counter-Strike 2 355 355
Cyberpunk 2077 196 196
Far Cry 5 204 204
Fortnite 270−280 270−280
Forza Horizon 4 278 278
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180 170−180
Valorant 300−350 300−350

Full HD
High

Atomic Heart 145 145
Battlefield 5 160−170 160−170
Counter-Strike 2 283 283
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280 270−280
Cyberpunk 2077 163 163
Far Cry 5 196 196
Fortnite 270−280 270−280
Forza Horizon 4 261 261
Grand Theft Auto V 178 178
Metro Exodus 172 172
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180 170−180
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 366 366
Valorant 300−350 300−350

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 160−170 160−170
Cyberpunk 2077 150 150
Far Cry 5 182 182
Forza Horizon 4 222 222
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180 170−180
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 200 200
Valorant 300−350 300−350

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 270−280 270−280

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 175 175
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 400−450 400−450
Grand Theft Auto V 140 140
Metro Exodus 106 106
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180 170−180
Valorant 350−400 350−400

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 140−150 140−150
Cyberpunk 2077 99 99
Far Cry 5 176 176
Forza Horizon 4 202 202
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 147 147

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 150−160 150−160

4K
High

Atomic Heart 50−55 50−55
Counter-Strike 2 42 42
Grand Theft Auto V 152 152
Metro Exodus 63 63
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 118 118
Valorant 300−350 300−350

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 100−110 100−110
Counter-Strike 2 75−80 75−80
Cyberpunk 2077 45 45
Far Cry 5 104 104
Forza Horizon 4 164 164
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 95−100 95−100

4K
Epic

Fortnite 75−80 75−80

This is how 8400 GS and RX 7800 XT compete in popular games:

  • RX 7800 XT is 21300% faster in 1080p

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 59 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.41 58.48
Recency 17 April 2007 25 August 2023
Maximum RAM amount 256 MB 16 GB
Chip lithography 80 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 40 Watt 263 Watt

8400 GS has 85% lower power consumption.

RX 7800 XT, on the other hand, has a 14163% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 16 years, a 6300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 94% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon RX 7800 XT is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 8400 GS in performance tests.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 686 votes

Rate GeForce 8400 GS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 5365 votes

Rate Radeon RX 7800 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 8400 GS or Radeon RX 7800 XT, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.