Radeon RX 5700 XT vs GeForce 8400 GS

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce 8400 GS and Radeon RX 5700 XT, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

8400 GS
2007, $30
256 MB DDR2, 40 Watt
0.41
RX 5700 XT
2019, $399
8 GB GDDR6, 225 Watt
38.31
+9244%

5700 XT outperforms 8400 GS by a whopping 9244% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1347139
Place by popularitynot in top-10050
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data32.25
Power efficiency0.8013.26
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)RDNA 1.0 (2019−2020)
GPU code nameG86Navi 10
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date17 April 2007 (19 years ago)7 July 2019 (7 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$29.99 $399

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores162560
Core clock speed459 MHz1605 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1905 MHz
Number of transistors210 million10,300 million
Manufacturing process technology80 nm7 nm
Power consumption (TDP)40 Watt225 Watt
Texture fill rate3.672304.8
Floating-point processing power0.02938 TFLOPS9.754 TFLOPS
ROPs464
TMUs8160
L2 Cache16 KB4 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length170 mm272 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNone1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR2GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount256 MB8 GB
Standard memory config per GPU256 MBno data
Memory bus width64 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed400 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth6.4 GB/s448.0 GB/s
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video1x HDMI 2.0b, 3x DisplayPort 1.4a
HDMI-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Readyno data+
Multi Monitorno data+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model4.06.8
OpenGL2.14.6
OpenCL1.12.1
VulkanN/A+
CUDA1.1-

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

8400 GS 0.41
RX 5700 XT 38.31
+9244%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

8400 GS 170
Samples: 3164
RX 5700 XT 16029
+9329%
Samples: 18393

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD1−2125
+12400%
1440p0−176
4K0−147

Cost per frame, $

1080p29.993.19
+89.4%
1440pno data5.25
4Kno data8.49
  • RX 5700 XT has 89% lower cost per frame in 1080p

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Atomic Heart 175 175
Counter-Strike 2 347 347
Cyberpunk 2077 78 78
Resident Evil 4 Remake 145 145

Full HD
Medium

Atomic Heart 133 133
Battlefield 5 119 119
Counter-Strike 2 308 308
Cyberpunk 2077 78 78
Far Cry 5 138 138
Fortnite 223 223
Forza Horizon 4 155 155
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 177 177
Valorant 313 313

Full HD
High

Atomic Heart 78 78
Battlefield 5 110 110
Counter-Strike 2 177 177
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280 270−280
Cyberpunk 2077 75 75
Dota 2 92 92
Far Cry 5 130 130
Fortnite 179 179
Forza Horizon 4 154 154
Grand Theft Auto V 145 145
Metro Exodus 97 97
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 166 166
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 154 154
Valorant 294 294

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 105 105
Cyberpunk 2077 67 67
Dota 2 103 103
Far Cry 5 111 111
Forza Horizon 4 148 148
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 139 139
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 93 93
Valorant 159 159

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 143 143

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 105 105
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280 270−280
Grand Theft Auto V 79 79
Metro Exodus 57 57
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180 170−180
Valorant 286 286

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 89 89
Cyberpunk 2077 40 40
Far Cry 5 97 97
Forza Horizon 4 119 119
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 70−75 70−75

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 93 93

4K
High

Atomic Heart 30−35 30−35
Counter-Strike 2 28 28
Grand Theft Auto V 79 79
Metro Exodus 35 35
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 54 54
Valorant 242 242

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 60 60
Counter-Strike 2 45−50 45−50
Cyberpunk 2077 17 17
Dota 2 93 93
Far Cry 5 53 53
Forza Horizon 4 79 79
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 53 53

4K
Epic

Fortnite 45 45

This is how 8400 GS and RX 5700 XT compete in popular games:

  • RX 5700 XT is 12400% faster in 1080p

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 62 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.41 38.31
Recency 17 April 2007 7 July 2019
Maximum RAM amount 256 MB 8 GB
Chip lithography 80 nm 7 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 40 Watt 225 Watt

8400 GS has 82% lower power consumption.

RX 5700 XT, on the other hand, has a 9244% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 12 years, a 3100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 91% more advanced lithography process.

The Radeon RX 5700 XT is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 8400 GS in performance tests.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 686 votes

Rate GeForce 8400 GS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.4 10347 votes

Rate Radeon RX 5700 XT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 8400 GS or Radeon RX 5700 XT, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.