GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile vs 8400 GS

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce 8400 GS with GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile, including specs and performance data.

8400 GS
2007, $30
256 MB DDR2, 40 Watt
0.41

RTX 4050 Mobile outperforms 8400 GS by a whopping 8227% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1341169
Place by popularitynot in top-10016
Power efficiency0.7952.82
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameG86AD107
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date17 April 2007 (19 years ago)3 January 2023 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$29.99 no data

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores162560
Core clock speed459 MHz1455 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1755 MHz
Number of transistors210 million18,900 million
Manufacturing process technology80 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)40 Watt50 Watt
Texture fill rate3.672140.4
Floating-point processing power0.02938 TFLOPS8.986 TFLOPS
ROPs448
TMUs880
Tensor Coresno data80
Ray Tracing Coresno data20
L1 Cacheno data2.5 MB
L2 Cache16 KB12 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Length170 mmno data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectorsNoneno data
SLI options+-

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR2GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount256 MB6 GB
Standard memory config per GPU256 MBno data
Memory bus width64 Bit96 Bit
Memory clock speed400 MHz16000 GB/s
Memory bandwidth6.4 GB/s192.0 GB/s
Shared memoryno data-
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-VideoPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model4.06.8
OpenGL2.14.6
OpenCL1.13.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA1.18.9
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

8400 GS 0.41
RTX 4050 Mobile 34.14
+8227%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

8400 GS 170
Samples: 3161
RTX 4050 Mobile 14222
+8266%
Samples: 13969

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD1−2
−9200%
93
+9200%
1440p0−149
4K-0−129

Cost per frame, $

1080p29.99no data

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 103
+0%
103
+0%
Palworld 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Resident Evil 4 Remake 81
+0%
81
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 166
+0%
166
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 82
+0%
82
+0%
Far Cry 5 124
+0%
124
+0%
Fortnite 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Palworld 96
+0%
96
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Valorant 200−210
+0%
200−210
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 112
+0%
112
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 69
+0%
69
+0%
Dota 2 169
+0%
169
+0%
Far Cry 5 114
+0%
114
+0%
Fortnite 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 124
+0%
124
+0%
Metro Exodus 85
+0%
85
+0%
Palworld 74
+0%
74
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 156
+0%
156
+0%
Valorant 200−210
+0%
200−210
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 120−130
+0%
120−130
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 65
+0%
65
+0%
Dota 2 162
+0%
162
+0%
Far Cry 5 107
+0%
107
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 80
+0%
80
+0%
Valorant 138
+0%
138
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 150−160
+0%
150−160
+0%
Palworld 73
+0%
73
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 79
+0%
79
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 240−250
+0%
240−250
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 58
+0%
58
+0%
Metro Exodus 50
+0%
50
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Valorant 240−250
+0%
240−250
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 37
+0%
37
+0%
Far Cry 5 69
+0%
69
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 58
+0%
58
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Palworld 51
+0%
51
+0%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 24
+0%
24
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 60
+0%
60
+0%
Metro Exodus 45
+0%
45
+0%
Palworld 36
+0%
36
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 45
+0%
45
+0%
Valorant 200−210
+0%
200−210
+0%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 18
+0%
18
+0%
Dota 2 115
+0%
115
+0%
Far Cry 5 43
+0%
43
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 60−65
+0%
60−65
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Palworld 26
+0%
26
+0%

This is how 8400 GS and RTX 4050 Mobile compete in popular games:

  • RTX 4050 Mobile is 9200% faster in 1080p

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 65 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.41 34.14
Recency 17 April 2007 3 January 2023
Maximum RAM amount 256 MB 6 GB
Chip lithography 80 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 40 Watt 50 Watt

8400 GS has 25% lower power consumption.

RTX 4050 Mobile, on the other hand, has a 8227% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 15 years, a 2300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 1500% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 8400 GS in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce 8400 GS is a desktop graphics card while GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 686 votes

Rate GeForce 8400 GS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 4698 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 8400 GS or GeForce RTX 4050 Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.