Arc Pro B50 vs GeForce 8400 GS PCI

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated213
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data45.70
Power efficiencyno data33.33
ArchitectureTesla 2.0 (2007−2013)Xe2-HPG (2025−2026)
GPU code nameGT218BMG-G21
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date17 April 2007 (19 years ago)5 September 2025 (less than a year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$349

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores162048
Core clock speed520 MHz1700 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2600 MHz
Number of transistors260 million19,600 million
Manufacturing process technology40 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)40 Watt70 Watt
Texture fill rate4.160332.8
Floating-point processing power0.03936 TFLOPS10.65 TFLOPS
ROPs416
TMUs8128
Ray Tracing Coresno data16
L2 Cache32 KB8 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIPCIe 5.0 x8
Length170 mm167 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsNoneNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount512 MB16 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed500 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth8 GB/s224.0 GB/s
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x HDMI, 1x VGA4x mini-DisplayPort 2.1
HDMI+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_1)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model4.16.6
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCL1.13.0
VulkanN/A1.4
CUDA1.2-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 17 April 2007 5 September 2025
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 16 GB
Chip lithography 40 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 40 Watt 70 Watt

8400 GS PCI has 75% lower power consumption.

Arc Pro B50, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 18 years, a 3100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 700% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 8400 GS PCI and Arc Pro B50. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce 8400 GS PCI is a desktop graphics card while Arc Pro B50 is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


4.7 653 votes

Rate GeForce 8400 GS PCI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.9 11 votes

Rate Arc Pro B50 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 8400 GS PCI or Arc Pro B50, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.