Tesla V100 FHHL vs GeForce 8300

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1446not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.46no data
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)Volta (2017−2020)
GPU code nameC78GV100
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date6 May 2008 (18 years ago)27 March 2018 (8 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores165120
Core clock speed500 MHz937 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1290 MHz
Number of transistors210 million21,100 million
Manufacturing process technology80 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)40 Watt250 Watt
Texture fill rate4.000412.8
Floating-point processing power0.048 TFLOPS13.21 TFLOPS
ROPs4128
TMUs8320
Tensor Coresno data640
L1 Cacheno data10 MB
L2 Cacheno data6 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIPCIe 3.0 x16
WidthIGP1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedHBM2
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared16 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared4096 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared810 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data829.4 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-VideoNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)12 (12_1)
Shader Model4.06.4
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCLN/A1.2
VulkanN/A1.2.131
CUDA-7.0
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 6 May 2008 27 March 2018
Chip lithography 80 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 40 Watt 250 Watt

GeForce 8300 has 525% lower power consumption.

Tesla V100 FHHL, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 9 years, and a 567% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 8300 and Tesla V100 FHHL. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce 8300 is a desktop graphics card while Tesla V100 FHHL is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.4 13 votes

Rate GeForce 8300 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3 12 votes

Rate Tesla V100 FHHL on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 8300 or Tesla V100 FHHL, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.