Radeon 780M vs GeForce 8200M G mGPU

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated376
Place by popularitynot in top-10042
Power efficiencyno data83.35
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)RDNA 3.0 (2022−2026)
GPU code nameC79Phoenix
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date3 June 2008 (18 years ago)31 January 2024 (2 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores16768
Core clock speed400 MHz800 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2900 MHz
Number of transistors314 million25,390 million
Manufacturing process technology65 nm4 nm
Power consumption (TDP)12 Watt15 Watt
Texture fill rate3.200139.2
Floating-point processing power0.0256 TFLOPS8.909 TFLOPS
ROPs432
TMUs848
Ray Tracing Coresno data12
L0 Cacheno data192 KB
L1 Cacheno data256 KB
L2 Cacheno data2 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Widthno dataIGP
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedSystem Shared
Maximum RAM amountSystem SharedSystem Shared
Memory bus widthSystem SharedSystem Shared
Memory clock speedSystem SharedSystem Shared
Shared memory++

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsMotherboard Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model4.06.8
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCLN/A2.1
VulkanN/A1.3

Pros & cons summary


Recency 3 June 2008 31 January 2024
Chip lithography 65 nm 4 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 12 Watt 15 Watt

8200M G mGPU has 20% lower power consumption.

Radeon 780M, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 15 years, and a 94% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 8200M G mGPU Intel and Radeon 780M. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce 8200M G mGPU Intel is a notebook graphics card while Radeon 780M is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.3 22 votes

Rate GeForce 8200M G mGPU Intel on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 2741 votes

Rate Radeon 780M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 8200M G mGPU Intel or Radeon 780M, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.