Arc A310 vs GeForce 8200M G mGPU

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated432
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiencyno data33.78
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)Xe-HPG (2022−2024)
GPU code nameC79DG2-128
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date3 June 2008 (18 years ago)12 October 2022 (3 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores16768
Core clock speed400 MHz1750 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1750 MHz
Number of transistors314 million7,200 million
Manufacturing process technology65 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)12 Watt30 Watt
Texture fill rate3.20056.00
Floating-point processing power0.0256 TFLOPSno data
ROPs416
TMUs832
Tensor Coresno data96
Ray Tracing Coresno data6
L1 Cacheno data1.1 MB
L2 Cacheno data4 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x8
Widthno data1-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared4 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared64 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1937 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data124.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs4x mini-DisplayPort 2.0

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model4.06.6
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCLN/A3.0
VulkanN/A1.4
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 3 June 2008 12 October 2022
Chip lithography 65 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 12 Watt 30 Watt

8200M G mGPU has 150% lower power consumption.

Arc A310, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 14 years, and a 983% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 8200M G mGPU Intel and Arc A310. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce 8200M G mGPU Intel is a notebook graphics card while Arc A310 is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.3 22 votes

Rate GeForce 8200M G mGPU Intel on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.7 315 votes

Rate Arc A310 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 8200M G mGPU Intel or Arc A310, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.