Tesla V100 SMX2 vs GeForce 8200

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1351not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.75no data
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)Volta (2017−2020)
GPU code nameC78GV100
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date6 May 2008 (18 years ago)21 June 2017 (9 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores165120
Core clock speed500 MHz1370 MHz
Number of transistors210 million21,100 million
Manufacturing process technology80 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)40 Watt250 Watt
Texture fill rate4.000438.4
Floating-point processing power0.0384 TFLOPSno data
ROPs4128
TMUs8320

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIPCIe 3.0 x16
WidthIGP2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno dataNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedHBM2
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared16 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared4096 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1758 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data900.1 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Videono data

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)12.0
Shader Model4.05.0
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCLN/A2.0
VulkanN/A-
CUDA-7.0

Pros & cons summary


Recency 6 May 2008 21 June 2017
Chip lithography 80 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 40 Watt 250 Watt

GeForce 8200 has 525% lower power consumption.

Tesla V100 SMX2, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 9 years, and a 567% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 8200 and Tesla V100 SMX2. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce 8200 is a desktop graphics card while Tesla V100 SMX2 is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.7 69 votes

Rate GeForce 8200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.3 6 votes

Rate Tesla V100 SMX2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 8200 or Tesla V100 SMX2, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.