Quadro K6000 SDI vs GeForce 8200

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1351not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.75no data
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)Kepler (2012−2018)
GPU code nameC78GK110
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date6 May 2008 (18 years ago)23 July 2013 (13 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$8,599

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores162880
Core clock speed500 MHz902 MHz
Number of transistors210 million7,080 million
Manufacturing process technology80 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)40 Watt239 Watt
Texture fill rate4.000216.5
Floating-point processing power0.0384 TFLOPS5.196 TFLOPS
ROPs448
TMUs8240
L1 Cacheno data240 KB
L2 Cacheno data1536 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIPCIe 3.0 x16
Lengthno data267 mm
WidthIGP3-slot

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR5
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared12 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared384 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1502 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data288.4 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-Video2x DVI, 2x DisplayPort

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)12 (11_0)
Shader Model4.05.1
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCLN/A1.2
VulkanN/A1.1.126
CUDA-3.5

Pros & cons summary


Recency 6 May 2008 23 July 2013
Chip lithography 80 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 40 Watt 239 Watt

GeForce 8200 has 498% lower power consumption.

K6000 SDI, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 5 years, and a 186% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 8200 and Quadro K6000 SDI. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce 8200 is a desktop graphics card while Quadro K6000 SDI is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.7 69 votes

Rate GeForce 8200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
5 2 votes

Rate Quadro K6000 SDI on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 8200 or Quadro K6000 SDI, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.