GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile vs 8200

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
8100 + nForce 720a 8200 8300 8300 GS 8400 8400 GS 8400 GS PCI 8400 GS PCI Rev. 2 8400 GS Rev. 2 8400 GS Rev. 3 8400 SE 8500 GT 8600 GS 8600 GT 8600 GT Mac Edition 8600 GTS 8600 GTS Mac Edition 8800 GS 8800 GS Mac Edition 8800 GT 8800 GT Mac Edition 8800 GTS 320 8800 GTS 512 8800 GTS 640 8800 GTS Core 112 8800 GTX 8800 Ultra 9100 9200
VS
#ad 
Buy on Amazon
2050 Max-Q 2050 Mobile 2060 Mobile 2060 Max-Q 2060 Max-Q Refresh 2060 Mobile Refresh 2060 SUPER Mobile 2070 Mobile 2070 Max-Q 2070 Max-Q Refresh 2070 Mobile Refresh 2070 Super Max-Q 2070 Super Mobile 2080 Mobile 2080 Max-Q 2080 Super Max-Q 2080 Super Mobile

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce 8200 with GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile, including specs and performance data.

GeForce 8200
2008
40 Watt
0.39
RTX 2080 Super Mobile
2020
8 GB GDDR6, 150 Watt
36.40
+9233%

RTX 2080 Super Mobile outperforms 8200 by a whopping 9233% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Contents

Share:
GeForce 8200 GeForce 8200
RTX 2080 Super Mobile RTX 2080 Super Mobile

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1352152
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency0.7518.78
ArchitectureTesla (2006−2010)Turing (2018−2022)
GPU code nameC78TU104
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date6 May 2008 (18 years ago)2 April 2020 (6 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores163072
Core clock speed500 MHz1365 MHz
Boost clock speedno data1560 MHz
Number of transistors210 million13,600 million
Manufacturing process technology80 nm12 nm
Power consumption (TDP)40 Watt150 Watt
Texture fill rate4.000299.5
Floating-point processing power0.0384 TFLOPS9.585 TFLOPS
ROPs464
TMUs8192
Tensor Coresno data384
Ray Tracing Coresno data48
L1 Cacheno data3 MB
L2 Cacheno data4 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Laptop sizeno datalarge
InterfacePCIPCIe 3.0 x16
WidthIGPno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeSystem SharedGDDR6
Maximum RAM amountSystem Shared8 GB
Memory bus widthSystem Shared256 Bit
Memory clock speedSystem Shared1750 MHz
Memory bandwidthno data448.0 GB/s
Shared memory+-

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors1x DVI, 1x VGA, 1x S-VideoNo outputs
G-SYNC support-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

VR Readyno data+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX11.1 (10_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model4.06.5
OpenGL3.34.6
OpenCLN/A1.2
VulkanN/A1.2.140
CUDA-7.5
DLSS-+

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD1−2
−13600%
137
+13600%
1440p1−2
−9400%
95
+9400%
4K0−165

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 200−210
+0%
200−210
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Resident Evil 4 Remake 95−100
+0%
95−100
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 169
+0%
169
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 200−210
+0%
200−210
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 121
+0%
121
+0%
Far Cry 5 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Fortnite 178
+0%
178
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Valorant 210−220
+0%
210−220
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 161
+0%
161
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 200−210
+0%
200−210
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Dota 2 153
+0%
153
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 121
+0%
121
+0%
Far Cry 5 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Fortnite 171
+0%
171
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 136
+0%
136
+0%
Metro Exodus 92
+0%
92
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 198
+0%
198
+0%
Valorant 210−220
+0%
210−220
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 147
+0%
147
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Dota 2 141
+0%
141
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 121
+0%
121
+0%
Far Cry 5 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 103
+0%
103
+0%
Valorant 205
+0%
205
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 136
+0%
136
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 90−95
+0%
90−95
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 250−260
+0%
250−260
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 90
+0%
90
+0%
Metro Exodus 55
+0%
55
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Valorant 250−260
+0%
250−260
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 121
+0%
121
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 102
+0%
102
+0%
Far Cry 5 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 100−110
+0%
100−110
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 104
+0%
104
+0%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 97
+0%
97
+0%
Metro Exodus 35
+0%
35
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 76
+0%
76
+0%
Valorant 220−230
+0%
220−230
+0%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 72
+0%
72
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 40−45
+0%
40−45
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 18−20
+0%
18−20
+0%
Dota 2 141
+0%
141
+0%
Escape from Tarkov 50
+0%
50
+0%
Far Cry 5 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 65−70
+0%
65−70
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 45−50
+0%
45−50
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 52
+0%
52
+0%

This is how GeForce 8200 and RTX 2080 Super Mobile compete in popular games:

  • RTX 2080 Super Mobile is 13600% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 2080 Super Mobile is 9400% faster in 1440p

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 63 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary

Performance score 0.39 36.40
Recency 6 May 2008 2 April 2020
Chip lithography 80 nm 12 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 40 Watt 150 Watt

GeForce 8200 has 275% lower power consumption.

RTX 2080 Super Mobile, on the other hand, has a 9233% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 11 years, and a 567% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 8200 in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce 8200 is a desktop graphics card while GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

GeForce 8200 GeForce 8200
vs
GeForce 9200 GeForce 9200
RTX 2080 Super Mobile GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile
vs
RX 6650M Radeon RX 6650M
GeForce 8200 GeForce 8200
vs
ATI HD 4350 Radeon HD 4350
GeForce 8200 GeForce 8200
vs
E9260 MXM Radeon E9260 MXM
GeForce 8200 GeForce 8200
vs
HD 6650A Radeon HD 6650A
GeForce 8200 GeForce 8200
vs
6800 GTO GeForce 6800 GTO
GeForce 8200 GeForce 8200
vs
FX 550 Quadro FX 550
GeForce 8200 GeForce 8200
vs
Pro Vega 20 Radeon Pro Vega 20
GeForce 8200 GeForce 8200
vs
RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation RTX 5000 Embedded Ada Generation
8100 + nForce 720a GeForce 8100 + nForce 720a
vs
RX 570G Radeon RX 570G
8100 + nForce 720a GeForce 8100 + nForce 720a
vs
Graphics 384SP Radeon Graphics 384SP
8100 + nForce 720a GeForce 8100 + nForce 720a
vs
RTX 3060 Max-Q GeForce RTX 3060 Max-Q
8100 + nForce 720a GeForce 8100 + nForce 720a
vs
A800 PCIe 40 GB A800 PCIe 40 GB

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.

2.7 69 votes

Rate GeForce 8200 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.2 139 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 8200 or GeForce RTX 2080 Super Mobile, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.