Tesla X2090 vs GeForce 805A

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot ratednot rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
ArchitectureKepler 2.0 (2013−2015)Fermi 2.0 (2010−2014)
GPU code nameGK208GF110
Market segmentLaptopWorkstation
Release date22 July 2014 (12 years ago)25 July 2011 (15 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores192512
Core clock speed719 MHz651 MHz
Boost clock speed758 MHzno data
Number of transistors915 million3,000 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm40 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt225 Watt
Texture fill rate12.1341.66
Floating-point processing power0.2911 TFLOPS1.332 TFLOPS
ROPs848
TMUs1664
L1 Cache32 KB1 MB
L2 Cache128 KB768 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 3.0 x8PCIe 2.0 x16
Widthno dataMXM Module

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount1 GB6 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit384 Bit
Memory clock speed1001 MHz924 MHz
Memory bandwidth16.02 GB/s177.4 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 (11_0)
Shader Model5.15.1
OpenGL4.64.6
OpenCL1.21.1
Vulkan1.1.126N/A
CUDA3.52.0

Pros & cons summary


Recency 22 July 2014 25 July 2011
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 6 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 40 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 225 Watt

GeForce 805A has an age advantage of 2 years, a 43% more advanced lithography process, and 1400% lower power consumption.

Tesla X2090, on the other hand, has a 500% higher maximum VRAM amount.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 805A and Tesla X2090. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce 805A is a notebook graphics card while Tesla X2090 is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 1 vote

Rate GeForce 805A on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.5 14 votes

Rate Tesla X2090 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 805A or Tesla X2090, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.