GeForce RTX 5090 vs 800M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce 800M with GeForce RTX 5090, including specs and performance data.

GeForce 800M
2014
1 GB DDR3, 15 Watt
1.17
RTX 5090
2025, $1,999
32 GB GDDR7, 575 Watt
92.97
+7846%

RTX 5090 outperforms 800M by a whopping 7846% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking11262
Place by popularitynot in top-10011
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data24.42
Power efficiency6.0812.61
ArchitectureFermi 2.0 (2010−2014)Blackwell 2.0 (2025−2026)
GPU code nameGF117GB202
Market segmentLaptopDesktop
Release date17 March 2014 (12 years ago)30 January 2025 (1 year ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$1,999

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores4821760
Core clock speed738 MHz2017 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2407 MHz
Number of transistors585 million92,200 million
Manufacturing process technology28 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Watt575 Watt
Texture fill rate5.9041,636.8
Floating-point processing power0.1417 TFLOPS104.8 TFLOPS
ROPs8176
TMUs8680
Tensor Coresno data680
Ray Tracing Coresno data170
L1 Cache64 KB21.3 MB
L2 Cache128 KB96 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCI Express 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16PCIe 5.0 x16
Lengthno data304 mm
Widthno data2-slot
Supplementary power connectorsno data1x 16-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3GDDR7
Maximum RAM amount1 GB32 GB
Memory bus width64 Bit512 Bit
Memory clock speed900 MHz1750 MHz
Memory bandwidth14.4 GB/s1.79 TB/s
Shared memoryno data-
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputs1x HDMI 2.1b, 3x DisplayPort 2.1b
HDMI-+

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

GPU Boost2.0no data
Optimus+-
GameWorks+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model5.16.8
OpenGL4.54.6
OpenCL1.13.0
VulkanN/A1.4
CUDA2.112.0
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

GeForce 800M 1.17
RTX 5090 92.97
+7846%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GeForce 800M 491
Samples: 29
RTX 5090 39000
+7843%
Samples: 11273

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD2−3227
+11250%
1440p2−3
−98.9%
189
4K1−2145
+14400%

Cost per frame, $

1080pno data8.81
1440pno data10.58
4Kno data13.79

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 300−350 300−350
Cyberpunk 2077 240−250 240−250
Hogwarts Legacy 170−180 170−180
Resident Evil 4 Remake 300−350 300−350

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 190−200 190−200
Counter-Strike 2 300−350 300−350
Cyberpunk 2077 240−250 240−250
Far Cry 5 240−250 240−250
Fortnite 300−350 300−350
Forza Horizon 4 300−350 300−350
Hogwarts Legacy 170−180 170−180
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180 170−180
Valorant 650−700 650−700

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 190−200 190−200
Counter-Strike 2 300−350 300−350
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280 270−280
Cyberpunk 2077 240−250 240−250
Far Cry 5 240−250 240−250
Fortnite 300−350 300−350
Forza Horizon 4 300−350 300−350
Grand Theft Auto V 170−180 170−180
Hogwarts Legacy 170−180 170−180
Metro Exodus 69 69
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180 170−180
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 400−450 400−450
Valorant 650−700 650−700

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 190−200 190−200
Cyberpunk 2077 240−250 240−250
Far Cry 5 309 309
Forza Horizon 4 300−350 300−350
Hogwarts Legacy 166 166
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180 170−180
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 352 352
Valorant 650−700 650−700

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 300−350 300−350

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 300−350 300−350
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 500−550 500−550
Grand Theft Auto V 160−170 160−170
Metro Exodus 202 202
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180 170−180
Valorant 450−500 450−500

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 190−200 190−200
Cyberpunk 2077 150−160 150−160
Far Cry 5 304 304
Forza Horizon 4 300−350 300−350
Hogwarts Legacy 160 160
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 321 321

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 150−160 150−160

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 87 87
Grand Theft Auto V 180−190 180−190
Hogwarts Legacy 136 136
Metro Exodus 167 167
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 383 383
Valorant 300−350 300−350

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 130−140 130−140
Counter-Strike 2 150−160 150−160
Cyberpunk 2077 80−85 80−85
Far Cry 5 231 231
Forza Horizon 4 300−350 300−350
Hogwarts Legacy 102 102
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 95−100 95−100

4K
Epic

Fortnite 75−80 75−80

This is how GeForce 800M and RTX 5090 compete in popular games:

  • RTX 5090 is 11250% faster in 1080p
  • RTX 5090 is 9350% faster in 1440p
  • RTX 5090 is 14400% faster in 4K

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 62 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.17 92.97
Recency 17 March 2014 30 January 2025
Maximum RAM amount 1 GB 32 GB
Chip lithography 28 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 15 Watt 575 Watt

GeForce 800M has 97% lower power consumption.

RTX 5090, on the other hand, has a 7846% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 10 years, a 3100% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 82% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce RTX 5090 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 800M in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce 800M is a notebook graphics card while GeForce RTX 5090 is a desktop one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 80 votes

Rate GeForce 800M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.4 4345 votes

Rate GeForce RTX 5090 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 800M or GeForce RTX 5090, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.