GeForce Go 6150 vs 800M

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce 800M and GeForce Go 6150, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

GeForce 800M
2014
1 GB DDR3, 15 Watt
1.17
+2240%

800M outperforms Go 6150 by a whopping 2240% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking11271570
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency6.08no data
ArchitectureFermi 2.0 (2010−2014)no data
GPU code nameGF117C51MV
Market segmentLaptopLaptop
Release date17 March 2014 (12 years ago)1 February 2006 (20 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA cores483
Core clock speed738 MHz1 MHz
Boost clock speedno data425 MHz
Number of transistors585 millionno data
Manufacturing process technology28 nm110 nm
Power consumption (TDP)15 Wattno data
Texture fill rate5.904no data
Floating-point processing power0.1417 TFLOPSno data
ROPs8no data
TMUs8no data
L1 Cache64 KBno data
L2 Cache128 KBno data

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

Bus supportPCI Express 3.0no data
InterfacePCIe 2.0 x16no data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeDDR3shared Memory
Maximum RAM amount1 GBno data
Memory bus width64 Bitno data
Memory clock speed900 MHzno data
Memory bandwidth14.4 GB/sno data
Shared memoryno data+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display ConnectorsNo outputsno data

Supported technologies

Supported technological solutions. This information will prove useful if you need some particular technology for your purposes.

GPU Boost2.0no data
Optimus+-
GameWorks+-

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX12 (11_0)shared Memory
Shader Model5.1no data
OpenGL4.5no data
OpenCL1.1no data
VulkanN/A-
CUDA2.1-

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

GeForce 800M 1.17
+2240%
Go 6150 0.05

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

GeForce 800M 491
+2484%
Samples: 29
Go 6150 19
Samples: 122

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.


FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Hogwarts Legacy 4−5 4−5

Full HD
Medium

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Forza Horizon 4 2−3 2−3
Hogwarts Legacy 4−5 4−5
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8 7−8
Valorant 24−27 24−27

Full HD
High

Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 9−10 9−10
Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Dota 2 7−8 7−8
Forza Horizon 4 2−3 2−3
Hogwarts Legacy 4−5 4−5
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8 7−8
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6 5−6
Valorant 24−27 24−27

Full HD
Ultra

Cyberpunk 2077 0−1 0−1
Dota 2 7−8 7−8
Forza Horizon 4 2−3 2−3
Hogwarts Legacy 4−5 4−5
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 7−8 7−8
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 5−6 5−6
Valorant 24−27 24−27

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 1−2 1−2
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 1−2 1−2

1440p
Ultra

Forza Horizon 4 0−1 0−1
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 1−2 1−2

4K
High

Grand Theft Auto V 14−16 14−16
Valorant 4−5 4−5

4K
Ultra

PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 1−2 1−2

4K
Epic

Fortnite 1−2 1−2

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 25 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 1.17 0.05
Recency 17 March 2014 1 February 2006
Chip lithography 28 nm 110 nm

GeForce 800M has a 2240% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 8 years, and a 75% more advanced lithography process.

The GeForce 800M is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce Go 6150 in performance tests.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3 80 votes

Rate GeForce 800M on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
1.7 11 votes

Rate GeForce Go 6150 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 800M or GeForce Go 6150, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.