Tesla K80m vs GeForce 7950 GX2

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1265not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.01no data
Power efficiency0.45no data
ArchitectureCurie (2003−2013)Kepler 2.0 (2013−2015)
GPU code nameG71GK210
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date5 June 2006 (20 years ago)17 November 2014 (11 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$599 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data2x 2496
Core clock speed500 MHz562 MHz
Boost clock speedno data824 MHz
Number of transistors278 million7,100 million
Manufacturing process technology90 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)110 Watt300 Watt
Texture fill rate12.00 ×22x 182.2 billion/sec
ROPs16 ×22x 48
TMUs24 ×22x 208

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Length270 mm267 mm
Width2-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount512 MB ×22x 12 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit ×22x 384 Bit
Memory clock speed600 MHz5012 MHz
Memory bandwidth38.4 GB/s ×22x 240.6 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-VideoNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0c (9_3)12.0 (11_1)
Shader Model3.0no data
OpenGL2.14.6
OpenCLN/Ano data
VulkanN/A-

Pros & cons summary


Recency 5 June 2006 17 November 2014
Chip lithography 90 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 110 Watt 300 Watt

7950 GX2 has 173% lower power consumption.

Tesla K80m, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 8 years, and a 221% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 7950 GX2 and Tesla K80m. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce 7950 GX2 is a desktop graphics card while Tesla K80m is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 58 votes

Rate GeForce 7950 GX2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.6 13 votes

Rate Tesla K80m on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 7950 GX2 or Tesla K80m, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.