Quadro FX 570 vs GeForce 7900 GTO

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the rankingnot rated1275
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluationno data0.01
Power efficiencyno data1.26
ArchitectureCurie (2003−2013)Tesla (2006−2010)
GPU code nameG71G84
Market segmentDesktopWorkstation
Release date1 October 2006 (19 years ago)12 September 2007 (18 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)no data$199

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data16
Core clock speed650 MHz460 MHz
Number of transistors278 million289 million
Manufacturing process technology90 nm80 nm
Power consumption (TDP)81 Watt38 Watt
Texture fill rate15.603.680
Floating-point processing powerno data0.02944 TFLOPS
ROPs168
TMUs248
L2 Cacheno data32 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 1.0 x16
Lengthno data198 mm
Width1-slot1-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3DDR2
Maximum RAM amount512 MB256 MB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed660 MHz400 MHz
Memory bandwidth42.24 GB/s12.8 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-Video2x DVI

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0c (9_3)11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model3.04.0
OpenGL2.13.3
OpenCLN/A1.1
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA-1.1

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 October 2006 12 September 2007
Maximum RAM amount 512 MB 256 MB
Chip lithography 90 nm 80 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 81 Watt 38 Watt

7900 GTO has a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount.

FX 570, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 11 months, a 13% more advanced lithography process, and 113% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 7900 GTO and Quadro FX 570. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce 7900 GTO is a desktop graphics card while Quadro FX 570 is a workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.6 10 votes

Rate GeForce 7900 GTO on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.6 19 votes

Rate Quadro FX 570 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 7900 GTO or Quadro FX 570, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.