GeForce GT 640M Mac Edition vs 7900 GT

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce 7900 GT with GeForce GT 640M Mac Edition, including specs and performance data.

7900 GT
2006
256 MB GDDR3, 48 Watt
0.62
GT 640M Mac Edition
2013
512 MB GDDR5, 32 Watt
0.95
+53.2%

640M Mac Edition outperforms 7900 GT by an impressive 53% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking12781189
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Power efficiency1.002.30
ArchitectureCurie (2003−2013)Kepler (2012−2018)
GPU code nameG71GK107
Market segmentDesktopLaptop
Release date9 March 2006 (20 years ago)3 February 2013 (13 years ago)

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data384
Core clock speed450 MHz745 MHz
Number of transistors278 million1,270 million
Manufacturing process technology90 nm28 nm
Power consumption (TDP)48 Watt32 Watt
Texture fill rate10.8023.84
Floating-point processing powerno data0.5722 TFLOPS
ROPs168
TMUs2432
L1 Cacheno data32 KB
L2 Cacheno data128 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 3.0 x16
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinno data

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR5
Maximum RAM amount256 MB512 MB
Memory bus width256 Bit64 Bit
Memory clock speed660 MHz1250 MHz
Memory bandwidth42.24 GB/s40 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-VideoNo outputs

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0c (9_3)12 (11_0)
Shader Model3.05.1
OpenGL2.14.6
OpenCLN/A1.2
VulkanN/A1.1.126
CUDA-3.0

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.62 0.95
Recency 9 March 2006 3 February 2013
Maximum RAM amount 256 MB 512 MB
Chip lithography 90 nm 28 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 48 Watt 32 Watt

GT 640M Mac Edition has a 53% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 6 years, a 100% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 221% more advanced lithography process, and 50% lower power consumption.

The GeForce GT 640M Mac Edition is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 7900 GT in performance tests.

Be aware that GeForce 7900 GT is a desktop graphics card while GeForce GT 640M Mac Edition is a notebook one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.5 43 votes

Rate GeForce 7900 GT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
3.5 11 votes

Rate GeForce GT 640M Mac Edition on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 7900 GT or GeForce GT 640M Mac Edition, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.