GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2 vs 7900 GS

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1271not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.01no data
Power efficiency0.99no data
ArchitectureCurie (2003−2013)Tesla 2.0 (2007−2013)
GPU code nameG71GT200B
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date1 May 2006 (20 years ago)23 July 2008 (18 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$259 $449

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data192
Core clock speed450 MHz576 MHz
Number of transistors278 million1,400 million
Manufacturing process technology90 nm55 nm
Power consumption (TDP)49 Watt182 Watt
Texture fill rate9.00036.86
Floating-point processing powerno data0.4769 TFLOPS
ROPs1628
TMUs2064
L2 Cacheno data224 KB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 2.0 x16
Length198 mm267 mm
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin2x 6-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR3
Maximum RAM amount256 MB896 MB
Memory bus width256 Bit448 Bit
Memory clock speed660 MHz999 MHz
Memory bandwidth42.24 GB/s111.9 GB/s

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-Video2x DVI, 1x S-Video

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0c (9_3)11.1 (10_0)
Shader Model3.04.0
OpenGL2.13.3
OpenCLN/A1.1
VulkanN/AN/A
CUDA-1.3

Pros & cons summary


Recency 1 May 2006 23 July 2008
Maximum RAM amount 256 MB 896 MB
Chip lithography 90 nm 55 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 49 Watt 182 Watt

7900 GS has 271% lower power consumption.

GTX 260 Rev. 2, on the other hand, has an age advantage of 2 years, a 250% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 64% more advanced lithography process.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 7900 GS and GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2. We've got no test results to judge.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 44 votes

Rate GeForce 7900 GS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.9 13 votes

Rate GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 7900 GS or GeForce GTX 260 Rev. 2, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.