Arc A770 vs GeForce 7900 GS

#ad 
Buy on Amazon
VS

Aggregate performance score

We've compared GeForce 7900 GS and Arc A770, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.

7900 GS
2006, $259
256 MB GDDR3, 49 Watt
0.63

A770 outperforms 7900 GS by a whopping 4986% based on our aggregate benchmark results.

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1271197
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.0147.99
Power efficiency0.9911.02
ArchitectureCurie (2003−2013)Generation 12.7 (2022−2023)
GPU code nameG71DG2-512
Market segmentDesktopDesktop
Release date1 May 2006 (20 years ago)12 October 2022 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$259 $329

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

Arc A770 has 479800% better value for money than 7900 GS.

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data4096
Core clock speed450 MHz2100 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2400 MHz
Number of transistors278 million21,700 million
Manufacturing process technology90 nm6 nm
Power consumption (TDP)49 Watt225 Watt
Texture fill rate9.000614.4
Floating-point processing powerno data19.66 TFLOPS
ROPs16128
TMUs20256
Tensor Coresno data512
Ray Tracing Coresno data32
L2 Cacheno data16 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length198 mmno data
Width1-slot2-slot
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pin1x 6-pin + 1x 8-pin

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount256 MB16 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit256 Bit
Memory clock speed660 MHz2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth42.24 GB/s512.0 GB/s
Shared memory--
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-Video1x HDMI 2.1, 3x DisplayPort 2.0
HDMI-+

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0c (9_3)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model3.06.6
OpenGL2.14.6
OpenCLN/A3.0
VulkanN/A1.3
DLSS-+

Synthetic benchmarks

Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.


Combined synthetic benchmark score

This is our combined benchmark score.

7900 GS 0.63
Arc A770 32.04
+4986%

Passmark

This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.

7900 GS 262
Samples: 225
Arc A770 13347
+4994%
Samples: 1775

Gaming performance

Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.

Average FPS across all PC games

Here are the average frames per second in a large set of popular games across different resolutions:

Full HD2−3
−5000%
102
+5000%
1440p1−2
−5800%
59
+5800%
4K0−137

Cost per frame, $

1080p129.50
−3915%
3.23
+3915%
1440p259.00
−4545%
5.58
+4545%
4Kno data8.89
  • Arc A770 has 3915% lower cost per frame in 1080p
  • Arc A770 has 4545% lower cost per frame in 1440p

FPS performance in popular games

Full HD
Low

Counter-Strike 2 317
+0%
317
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 78
+0%
78
+0%
Palworld 127
+0%
127
+0%
Resident Evil 4 Remake 166
+0%
166
+0%

Full HD
Medium

Battlefield 5 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 270
+0%
270
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 70
+0%
70
+0%
Far Cry 5 117
+0%
117
+0%
Fortnite 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 33
+0%
33
+0%
Palworld 106
+0%
106
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
Valorant 200−210
+0%
200−210
+0%

Full HD
High

Battlefield 5 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 143
+0%
143
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 270−280
+0%
270−280
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 61
+0%
61
+0%
Far Cry 5 109
+0%
109
+0%
Fortnite 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 31
+0%
31
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 105
+0%
105
+0%
Metro Exodus 113
+0%
113
+0%
Palworld 82
+0%
82
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 196
+0%
196
+0%
Valorant 200−210
+0%
200−210
+0%

Full HD
Ultra

Battlefield 5 110−120
+0%
110−120
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 58
+0%
58
+0%
Far Cry 5 104
+0%
104
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 23
+0%
23
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 130−140
+0%
130−140
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 72
+0%
72
+0%
Valorant 200−210
+0%
200−210
+0%

Full HD
Epic

Fortnite 140−150
+0%
140−150
+0%
Palworld 79
+0%
79
+0%

1440p
High

Counter-Strike 2 90
+0%
90
+0%
Counter-Strike: Global Offensive 220−230
+0%
220−230
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 45
+0%
45
+0%
Metro Exodus 71
+0%
71
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 170−180
+0%
170−180
+0%
Valorant 230−240
+0%
230−240
+0%

1440p
Ultra

Battlefield 5 85−90
+0%
85−90
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 45
+0%
45
+0%
Far Cry 5 82
+0%
82
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 15
+0%
15
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 60
+0%
60
+0%

1440p
Epic

Fortnite 80−85
+0%
80−85
+0%
Palworld 60
+0%
60
+0%

4K
High

Counter-Strike 2 28
+0%
28
+0%
Grand Theft Auto V 48
+0%
48
+0%
Metro Exodus 47
+0%
47
+0%
Palworld 27−30
+0%
27−30
+0%
The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt 73
+0%
73
+0%
Valorant 190−200
+0%
190−200
+0%

4K
Ultra

Battlefield 5 50−55
+0%
50−55
+0%
Counter-Strike 2 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Cyberpunk 2077 26
+0%
26
+0%
Far Cry 5 49
+0%
49
+0%
Forza Horizon 4 8
+0%
8
+0%
PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%

4K
Epic

Fortnite 35−40
+0%
35−40
+0%
Palworld 34
+0%
34
+0%

This is how 7900 GS and Arc A770 compete in popular games:

  • Arc A770 is 5000% faster in 1080p
  • Arc A770 is 5800% faster in 1440p

All in all, in popular games:

  • there's a draw in 62 tests (100%)

Pros & cons summary


Performance score 0.63 32.04
Recency 1 May 2006 12 October 2022
Maximum RAM amount 256 MB 16 GB
Chip lithography 90 nm 6 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 49 Watt 225 Watt

7900 GS has 359% lower power consumption.

Arc A770, on the other hand, has a 4986% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 16 years, a 6300% higher maximum VRAM amount, and a 1400% more advanced lithography process.

The Arc A770 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 7900 GS in performance tests.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


3.2 44 votes

Rate GeForce 7900 GS on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
4.7 5529 votes

Rate Arc A770 on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 7900 GS or Arc A770, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.