RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation vs GeForce 7800 GT

Primary details

GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.

Place in the ranking1283not rated
Place by popularitynot in top-100not in top-100
Cost-effectiveness evaluation0.01no data
Power efficiency0.70no data
ArchitectureCurie (2003−2013)Ada Lovelace (2022−2024)
GPU code nameG70AD107
Market segmentDesktopMobile workstation
Release date11 August 2005 (21 years ago)21 March 2023 (3 years ago)
Launch price (MSRP)$449 no data

Cost-effectiveness evaluation

The higher the ratio, the better. We use the manufacturer's recommended prices.

no data

Performance to price scatter graph

Currently popular graphics cards are shown for comparison.

Detailed specifications

General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.

Pipelines / CUDA coresno data3072
Core clock speed400 MHz1530 MHz
Boost clock speedno data2010 MHz
Number of transistors302 million18,900 million
Manufacturing process technology110 nm5 nm
Power consumption (TDP)65 Watt50 Watt
Texture fill rate8.000193.0
Floating-point processing powerno data12.35 TFLOPS
ROPs1648
TMUs2096
Tensor Coresno data96
Ray Tracing Coresno data24
L1 Cacheno data3 MB
L2 Cacheno data12 MB

Form factor & compatibility

Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).

InterfacePCIe 1.0 x16PCIe 4.0 x16
Length226 mmno data
Width1-slotno data
Supplementary power connectors1x 6-pinNone

VRAM capacity and type

Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.

Memory typeGDDR3GDDR6
Maximum RAM amount256 MB8 GB
Memory bus width256 Bit128 Bit
Memory clock speed500 MHz2000 MHz
Memory bandwidth32 GB/s256.0 GB/s
Resizable BAR-+

Connectivity and outputs

This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.

Display Connectors2x DVI, 1x S-VideoPortable Device Dependent

API and SDK support

List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.

DirectX9.0c (9_3)12 Ultimate (12_2)
Shader Model3.06.8
OpenGL2.14.6
OpenCLN/A3.0
VulkanN/A1.3
CUDA-8.9
DLSS-+

Pros & cons summary


Recency 11 August 2005 21 March 2023
Maximum RAM amount 256 MB 8 GB
Chip lithography 110 nm 5 nm
Power consumption (TDP) 65 Watt 50 Watt

RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation has an age advantage of 17 years, a 3100% higher maximum VRAM amount, a 2100% more advanced lithography process, and 30% lower power consumption.

We couldn't decide between GeForce 7800 GT and RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation. We've got no test results to judge.

Be aware that GeForce 7800 GT is a desktop graphics card while RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation is a mobile workstation one.

Other comparisons

We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.

Community ratings

Here you can see the user ratings of the compared graphics cards, as well as rate them yourself.


2.5 71 votes

Rate GeForce 7800 GT on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
2.8 4 votes

Rate RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation on a scale of 1 to 5:

  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5

Comments

Here you can give us your opinion about GeForce 7800 GT or RTX 2000 Embedded Ada Generation, agree or disagree with our ratings, or report errors or inaccuracies on the site.