Radeon 620 vs GeForce 7150M
Aggregate performance score
We've compared GeForce 7150M and Radeon 620, covering specs and all relevant benchmarks.
620 outperforms 7150M by a whopping 5500% based on our aggregate benchmark results.
Contents
Primary details
GPU architecture, market segment, value for money and other general parameters compared.
| Place in the ranking | 1569 | 924 |
| Place by popularity | not in top-100 | not in top-100 |
| Power efficiency | no data | 3.49 |
| Architecture | no data | GCN 3.0 (2014−2019) |
| GPU code name | C67 | Polaris 24 |
| Market segment | Laptop | Laptop |
| Release date | 1 February 2006 (20 years ago) | 13 May 2019 (7 years ago) |
Detailed specifications
General parameters such as number of shaders, GPU core base clock and boost clock speeds, manufacturing process, texturing and calculation speed. Real power consumption of some graphics cards can well exceed their nominal TDP, especially if overclocked.
| Pipelines / CUDA cores | 3 | 384 |
| Core clock speed | 1 MHz | 730 MHz |
| Boost clock speed | 425 MHz | 1024 MHz |
| Number of transistors | no data | 1,550 million |
| Manufacturing process technology | 90 nm | 28 nm |
| Power consumption (TDP) | no data | 50 Watt |
| Texture fill rate | no data | 24.58 |
| Floating-point processing power | no data | 0.7864 TFLOPS |
| ROPs | no data | 8 |
| TMUs | no data | 24 |
| L1 Cache | no data | 96 KB |
| L2 Cache | no data | 128 KB |
Form factor & compatibility
Information on compatibility with other computer components. Useful when choosing a future computer configuration or upgrading an existing one. For desktop graphics cards it's interface and bus (motherboard compatibility), additional power connectors (power supply compatibility).
| Interface | no data | PCIe 3.0 x8 |
| Supplementary power connectors | no data | None |
VRAM capacity and type
Parameters of VRAM installed: its type, size, bus, clock and resulting bandwidth. Integrated GPUs have no dedicated video RAM and use a shared part of system RAM.
| Memory type | shared Memory | DDR3 |
| Maximum RAM amount | no data | 2 GB |
| Memory bus width | no data | 64 Bit |
| Memory clock speed | no data | 900 MHz |
| Memory bandwidth | no data | 14.4 GB/s |
| Shared memory | + | - |
Connectivity and outputs
This section shows the types and number of video connectors on each GPU. The data applies specifically to desktop reference models (for example, NVIDIA’s Founders Edition). OEM partners often modify both the number and types of ports. On notebook GPUs, video‐output options are determined by the laptop’s design rather than the graphics chip itself.
| Display Connectors | no data | No outputs |
API and SDK support
List of supported 3D and general-purpose computing APIs, including their specific versions.
| DirectX | shared Memory | 12 (12_0) |
| Shader Model | no data | 6.3 |
| OpenGL | no data | 4.6 |
| OpenCL | no data | 2.0 |
| Vulkan | - | 1.2.131 |
Synthetic benchmarks
Non-gaming benchmark results comparison. The combined score is measured on a 0-100 point scale.
Combined synthetic benchmark score
This is our combined benchmark score.
Passmark
This is the most ubiquitous GPU benchmark. It gives the graphics card a thorough evaluation under various types of load, providing four separate benchmarks for Direct3D versions 9, 10, 11 and 12 (the last being done in 4K resolution if possible), and few more tests engaging DirectCompute capabilities.
Gaming performance
Let's see how good the compared graphics cards are for gaming. Particular gaming benchmark results are measured in FPS.
FPS performance in popular games
Full HD
Low
| Atomic Heart | 0−1 | 5−6 |
Full HD
Medium
| Atomic Heart | 0−1 | 5−6 |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 2−3 | 12−14
+500%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 7−8 | 12−14
+71.4%
|
| Valorant | 24−27 | 40−45
+61.5%
|
Full HD
High
| Atomic Heart | 0−1 | 5−6 |
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 9−10 | 45−50
+400%
|
| Dota 2 | 7−8 | 24−27
+243%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 2−3 | 12−14
+500%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 7−8 | 12−14
+71.4%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 5−6 | 9−10
+80%
|
| Valorant | 24−27 | 40−45
+61.5%
|
Full HD
Ultra
| Dota 2 | 7−8 | 24−27
+243%
|
| Forza Horizon 4 | 2−3 | 12−14
+500%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 7−8 | 12−14
+71.4%
|
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 5−6 | 9−10
+80%
|
| Valorant | 24−27 | 40−45
+61.5%
|
1440p
High
| Counter-Strike 2 | 1−2 | 5−6
+400%
|
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 0−1 | 21−24 |
1440p
Ultra
| The Witcher 3: Wild Hunt | 1−2 | 3−4
+200%
|
4K
High
| Far Cry 6 | 5−6 | 5−6 |
| Grand Theft Auto V | 14−16 | 14−16
+7.1%
|
| Valorant | 4−5 | 10−12
+175%
|
4K
Ultra
| PLAYERUNKNOWN'S BATTLEGROUNDS | 1−2 | 3−4
+200%
|
4K
Epic
| Fortnite | 1−2 | 3−4
+200%
|
Full HD
Low
| Counter-Strike 2 | 5−6 | 5−6 |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 4−5 | 4−5 |
Full HD
Medium
| Battlefield 5 | 6−7 | 6−7 |
| Counter-Strike 2 | 5−6 | 5−6 |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 4−5 | 4−5 |
| Far Cry 5 | 6−7 | 6−7 |
| Fortnite | 10−12 | 10−12 |
Full HD
High
| Battlefield 5 | 6−7 | 6−7 |
| Counter-Strike 2 | 5−6 | 5−6 |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 4−5 | 4−5 |
| Far Cry 5 | 6−7 | 6−7 |
| Far Cry 6 | 3−4 | 3−4 |
| Fortnite | 10−12 | 10−12 |
| Grand Theft Auto V | 5−6 | 5−6 |
| Metro Exodus | 4−5 | 4−5 |
Full HD
Ultra
| Battlefield 5 | 6−7 | 6−7 |
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 4−5 | 4−5 |
| Far Cry 5 | 6−7 | 6−7 |
Full HD
Epic
| Fortnite | 10−12 | 10−12 |
1440p
High
| Counter-Strike: Global Offensive | 16−18 | 16−18 |
| Far Cry 6 | 3−4 | 3−4 |
| Valorant | 20−22 | 20−22 |
1440p
Ultra
| Cyberpunk 2077 | 1−2 | 1−2 |
| Far Cry 5 | 3−4 | 3−4 |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 5−6 | 5−6 |
1440p
Epic
| Fortnite | 4−5 | 4−5 |
4K
High
| Atomic Heart | 1−2 | 1−2 |
4K
Ultra
| Dota 2 | 5−6 | 5−6 |
| Far Cry 5 | 1−2 | 1−2 |
| Forza Horizon 4 | 1−2 | 1−2 |
Here's the range of performance differences observed across popular games:
- in Forza Horizon 4, with 1080p resolution and the Medium Preset, the Radeon 620 is 500% faster.
All in all, in popular games:
- Radeon 620 performs better in 20 tests (39%)
- there's a draw in 31 tests (61%)
Pros & cons summary
| Performance score | 0.04 | 2.24 |
| Recency | 1 February 2006 | 13 May 2019 |
| Chip lithography | 90 nm | 28 nm |
Radeon 620 has a 5500% higher aggregate performance score, an age advantage of 13 years, and a 69% more advanced lithography process.
The Radeon 620 is our recommended choice as it beats the GeForce 7150M in performance tests.
Other comparisons
We selected several comparisons of graphics cards with performance close to those reviewed, providing you with more options to consider.
